Ubuntu QA:
BlogBrainstormPackage status
Log in
Ubuntu QA
The Ubuntu community has contributed 22700 ideas, 138270 comments, 2629576 votes
Idea sandbox Idea sandbox
Popular ideas Popular ideas
Ideas in development Ideas in development
Implemented ideas Implemented ideas

Contributor markba

Improve the "Save as..." and "Open file" Nautilus mini-browser  
Written by fde the 29 Feb 08 at 09:54. Global category: Office. New
When you want to open a file, or save a file from an application, you have to use this mini file browser. It is tiny, not easily usable, and particularly frustrating when searching for an image, since you can't have a thumbnail of them.

It should be bigger by default, and it should be possible to choose the view of the file (list, details or thumbnails).
853
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #1199
Written by fde the 29 Feb 08 at 09:54.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #1199 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!
353
votes
up equal down
Solution #2: Solution #1 + Also allow thumbnailed preview
Written by akurei the 10 Oct 09 at 18:37.
In the open/save dialog you should be able to view items as thumbnails and not only in list-view (CTRL + 1 view in nautilus instead of CTRL + 2).
720
votes
up equal down
Solution #2: Add all nautilus functions in save/open dialog menus
Written by billdotson the 4 Oct 09 at 18:42.
Be able to delete, rename, make new files, etc. in the open/save dialog windows in nautilus.
-147
votes
up equal down
Solution #3: Add unlock/lock button for file managing operation.
Written by Lachu the 11 Oct 09 at 09:48.
Add unlock/lock button to open/save dialog for deleting/moving operations. All operations, that can brings lost of data must be done in unlock mode.
-125
votes
up equal down
Solution #4: Use Nautilus instead of open/save file dialog
Written by natureflow the 12 Oct 09 at 16:10.
Nautilus has all features you eventually will miss in a normal open/save file dialog. If you bloat the open/save dialog with file management tasks, people will mistake the dialog for the file manager, like people do using Windows Vista. If you click on a file, you expect the file to be opened, but if you accidentally were in a save dialog, you could have overwritten an important file. So I propose to open the file manager instead of the open/save dialog to make things clear. There in the file manager will be a new file in the sidebar. This is your document. You can navigate to your favorite folder and drag and drop your file there or click the "Save file here" button.



-162
votes
up equal down
Solution #5: The firefox way
Written by natureflow the 12 Oct 09 at 16:22.
You click on "Save" and get a little dialog with "Name", "Folder" and "Tags", like you see it if you click on the star in the address bar in the firefox browser. So you can easily rename your document if you want. If you want you can click on a button to get more options. File management tasks confuse the user, keep it simple.

One-Click Bookmarking screenshot
-16
votes
up equal down
Solution #6: Just add one button in open/save dialog to "Open file browser"
Written by oliver-joos the 25 Oct 09 at 09:52.
I would prefer a button in the open/save dialog next to the "Create new folder" button. This button would open a Nautilus window showing the same folder as the open/save dialog.

This solution only needs two clicks more than #1 (to open & close Nautilus), does not bloat the open/save dialog and follows the DRY design principle ("Don't Repeat Yourself").
-4
votes
up equal down
Solution #8: firefox: html only or full selector should be in "collapsed" mode
Written by dinar the 24 Jan 10 at 06:30.
html only or full selector of save as dialog fo firefox should be in "collapsed" mode of the dialog.
-2
votes
up equal down
Solution #9: Add Mini Browser plugin
Written by afrodeity the 17 Nov 10 at 16:33.
A mini browser that is customisable, anything which acts as a replacement, this would mean allowing some form of input to replace the current open with/save dialogues. Progress in any direction frankly would be worth it. Let's have choices in how we do this.

See the 9 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 9 Jan 13 at 16:14) >>

Previews or thumbnails in file chooser   forum
Written by jimmux the 28 Feb 08 at 23:46. Global category: Look and Feel. Implemented
Too often I have to select images with cryptic file names from a file chooser. Because I can't see the images I typically have to open the folder I am browsing separately so I can find image I am looking for, remember the cryptic name, and return to the file dialogue to select the file I want.

This could be easier if their was an option to view thumbnails, or to at least preview the image.

Developer comments
File preview is now in Hardy.
909
votes
implemented
Selected solution (#1): Auto-generated solution of idea #240
Written by jimmux the 28 Feb 08 at 23:46.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #240 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

See the 21 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 9 Jan 13 at 16:08) >>

Make gnome-system-monitor more accessible via CTRL-ALT-DELETE  
Written by strattonbrazil the 14 Jul 08 at 22:28. Related project: Gnome. New
gnome-system-monitor provides a cleaner interface than Windows "Task Manager", and provides many useful features including list of processes running, memory and network usage, etc.

This functionality should be more accessible by key binding it by default to CTRL-ALT-DELETE as Windows does--as this is more familiar to users coming from Windows. The current key binding for CTRL-ALT-DELETE brings up the shutdown/logout options, which is already accessible as a desktop button, which is redundant for a relatively less used function.

gnome-system-monitor is an idle interface for monitoring the system and killing processes without using the terminal and provides an interface for doing this that most are already familiar with. Changing it's key binding would make it's functionality much more accessible.
1121
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #11133
Written by strattonbrazil the 14 Jul 08 at 22:28.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #11133 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!
615
votes
up equal down
Solution #2: Give key combination that forces 'recovery screen' on screen
Written by jarko_ the 22 Feb 09 at 12:46.
Like in some other systems, associate key combination to bring up 'recovery screen' or similary named one.

This window doesn't have to be normal GTK-window, but something from the upper level, like GDM (or xorg if going for extreme) created 'recovery screen/task manager'. This should ensure that no window or full screen application could hide or block the 'recovery screen'.

This recovery screen could have options to kill programs, log out, shutdown and lock computer etc.
-136
votes
up equal down
Solution #3: Add "close annoying application" to System Monitor
Written by Magnes the 23 Feb 09 at 07:46.
If there is an application that uses all the resources allow closing it (if it uses all the memory) or make it nicer (if it uses all the CPU) by one click in System Monitor.
53
votes
up equal down
Solution #4: Solution #1 + Separate X Session & NCurses
Written by jamessnell the 26 Feb 09 at 20:37.
== Graphical ==
If a separate X session configured entirely to show a System Monitor could be very well insulated from buggy applications.

In those cases where a game causes you to change video modes and then screws up, you'll still have a graceful way to touch the System Monitor.

== Command-Line ==
An ncurses interface (like that of "aptitude") for the command line would also be awesome for those cases when the entire Xorg system ignores you. This would help when the keyboard is being ignored as it'd be fast to pull up over ssh.


Yes this is could basically be a wrapper interface to ps.
-53
votes
up equal down
Solution #5: Just make a ncurses application (with mouse support)
Written by zooounds the 3 Mar 09 at 11:15.
It rest in a tty until needed and can be used to kill application even if X is totaly broken.
-48
votes
up equal down
Solution #6: Add "Open System Monitor" option to Logout dialog
Written by cousteau the 5 Mar 09 at 17:27.
Ctrl+Alt+Del opens the Logout dialog (at least on Hardy). So it would be nice to add an "Open System Monitor" option to it.
84
votes
up equal down
Solution #7: Add xKill and gnome-system-monitor to the available functions for shortcuts
Written by jackmcslay the 7 Mar 09 at 14:57.
This is a continuation of #2. We should get xkill and gnome-system-monitor among the available action options on
System>Preferences>Keyboard shortcuts

so, even if Ctrl+Alt+Del remains as "logout" shortcut, the option of binding it to Ctrl+Alt+Del remains available
90
votes
up equal down
Solution #8: Bring back ctrl-alt-esc to fire up xkill (or gnome equivalent)
Written by Tom Mann the 12 Mar 09 at 20:47.
In KDE and XFCE, if you hit CTRL-ALT-ESC, your cursor turns into an X (or a skull and crossbones) and clicking any app (it doesn't have to be stuck) kills it.

I still don't get why it disappeared from Ubuntu's Gnome Desktop (I'm not sure if this happens on any other distros Gnome desktop)
21
votes
up equal down
Solution #9: Renice too-busy processes + bring up system monitor
Written by quartz the 20 Mar 09 at 17:12.
The system monitor window needs to be responsive, not just there.

Just bringing up system monitor (or a new manager if necessary) is not enough is the CPU is totally taken, if it comes up, any process(es) that might be hogging resources should be reniced to a slightly lower priority and the system monitor process should be started fairly high.

(A good question is what to do if the problem is with X itself, since renicing it might slow down the system monitor too)
20
votes
up equal down
Solution #10: Capture CAD in kernel and GUI task manager draw direct to screen (framebuffer)
Written by Craig73 the 21 Mar 09 at 14:28.
Capture CTRL+ALT+DEL (or perhaps the second CTRL+ALT+DEL for just "frozen systems") at the kernel level, which opens a graphical task manager (logoff / process manager / whatever) which draws directly to the screen (bypassing X which may be frozen)

To implement this - it would write to the framebuffer, and would likely require KMS and DRI2. [Ideally it would capture the current screen in the framebuffer, and draw the dialog on top, for a integrated feeling].

Then have it fall back to VGA text only if it can't grab a graphical framebuffer (things are really hurting)

My intent is to handle cases such as X being frozen, or in a full screen game, etc.
6
votes
up equal down
Solution #11: Add a "magic keys" combinaison
Written by qwerty800 the 11 Jun 09 at 21:17.
It would be really nice to have a shortcut like Alt+SysRq+X, that automatically kill the focused application. Using a such shortcut would avoid the inconvenience of passing trough the task manager, nor restart the whole X server and to work with the full screen programs! Having a 16:10 monitor often causes me to get stuck with unsupported resolutions. When that happens, I have to restart my whole X server and THAT'S annoying!

Plus, "X" is easy to remember, because:
*It's not currently used.
*It can refer to Xkill
*It can refer to Xorg
*It can refer to the Window decoration (X=Close)!
11
votes
up equal down
Solution #12: Set xkill command for Ctrl+Alt+Esc by default
Written by Shnatsel the 25 Jul 09 at 10:09.
Xfce did so, and if something hangs, it's easy to kill it. GNOME has a panel applet for such purposes, but if a fullscreen game hangs, it's useless.
-2
votes
up equal down
Solution #13: easy solution
Written by viva.amego the 5 Mar 10 at 03:37.
its good idea and there is an easy solution for now


right click (system > administration > system monitor)
select (add this launcher to panel)
right click (system monitor "in panel")
select (properties )
copy ( command )

run (system > preference > keyboard shortcuts)
click ( add)

name -> system monitor
command -> right click( paste)

click (apply)

and you had shourtcut
4
votes
up equal down
Solution #14: Start new X Session
Written by Lachu the 28 Mar 10 at 17:06.
Simply start a new X Session for every application using fullscreen mode.
3
votes
up equal down
Solution #15: Option to disallow fullscreen for all applications.
Written by trezker the 28 Mar 10 at 05:57.
Simply put, whenever an app makes a call to set a fullscreen mode the system refuses to do it.
2
votes
up equal down
Solution #16: CTRL ALT DEL minimize all windows and open gnome-system-monitor. Tested!
Written by dottornik the 27 Apr 10 at 14:51.
Gizmod intercepts ctrl-alt-del (even when fullscreen application have focus) and execute:
wmctrl -k on (minimize all windows)
gnome-system-monitor

tested in Lucid & Karmic and work with:
-XBMC fullscreen crashed by youtube plugin
-fullscreen crashed gmameui
-fullscreen crashed flash player
-lot of crashed stuff

Instructions:

-install wmctrl
sudo apt-get install wmctrl

-disable default ctrl-alt-del shortcut from System>Preferences>Keyboard shortcuts

-install gizmod
http://gizmod.sourceforge.net/
install and set group permissions (see HOWTO - Setting Input Device Permissions - Creating a udev Rule)

-edit 199-Keyboard-Default.py in ~/.gizmod/gizmod/modules.d/
add this:

elif Gizmo.getKeyState(GizmoKey.KEY_DELETE) >= 1 and Gizmo.getKeyState(GizmoKey.KEY_LEFTCTRL) >= 1 and Gizmo.getKeyState(GizmoKey.KEY_LEFTALT) >= 1:

subprocess.Popen(["wmctrl", "-k", "on"])
subprocess.Popen(["gnome-system-monitor"])
return True

This is a python script, please respect document indentation!

Excuse me for my bad english...

coming soon:
automatic install and config script....

See the 52 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 1 Jan 13 at 01:34) >>

Gedit litters my hard drive with temp files.  
Written by r0g the 30 Jan 09 at 05:32. Global category: Others. New
The ones with ~ at the end of them. This is not good for security and it's annoying.

There _is_ an option to disable this but, as it rightly points out, if it were to crash at any point in the saving process you've lost your edits.
202
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Use the bloody /tmp folder like everything else.
Written by r0g the 30 Jan 09 at 05:32.
If you need to use a temp file that, surely, is where to put it. Naturally it should not be set to readable and deleted once the save has completed successfully.
-26
votes
up equal down
Solution #2: Option to use a backup folder instead
Written by eliseobc the 30 Jan 09 at 20:31.
These files are really the last backup for any file modified by gedit, It is better to move them to a backup folder.
-57
votes
up equal down
Solution #3: Disable backup files in GEdit by default
Written by Lex the 31 Jan 09 at 09:48.
Simply disable backup files (~) in GEdit by default. (Most users are not aware of then anyway.)
39
votes
up equal down
Solution #4: Just clean the files up on successful save
Written by mhogerheijde the 15 Feb 09 at 22:11.
Vi also makes temp files (.[filename].tmp) with the same permissions as the original file. But it cleans its files up!

Why can't Gedit just clean its files after a successful save?
4
votes
up equal down
Solution #5: Delete hidden files on closing Gedit
Written by firexq the 22 Apr 09 at 03:12.
Self explanatory. Gedit should delete the hidden files on closing and--in the case of unexpected crash--handle them the next time Gedit is launched.

See the 13 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 29 Dec 12 at 12:43) >>

column mode is essential feature of power text editor   forum
Written by grofaty the 25 Jan 09 at 13:00. Global category: Office. New
In Windows XP I use UltraEdit very powerful text editor. The best feature of this tools is using "column mode". When "column mode" is turned on then instead of marking with mouse whole rows only text in each line in the same column block is marked. Then when Delete key is pressed the whole column text is deleted. When "column mode" is turned on and only one cursor is displayed in each column (no character selected) then when typing text it appears in each line in the same column width.

The same functionality is available in other tools like Microsoft Word - turning column mode by pressing Alt+mouse move. Something very similar is in Adobe PDF Reader - turning column mode the same way as Microsoft Word.

Something similar has a tool Kate (KDE environment) by pressing Ctrl+Shift+B (block mode), but it looks like it is not working correctly if tabulator characters are used.
116
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: add column mode feature as basic feature in Gedit
Written by grofaty the 25 Jan 09 at 13:00.
I suggest to program column mode feature as one of default features in Gedit and add functionalities:
1. add Edit | Column mode option to turn on/off column mode
2. add shortcut key - something like Alt+c
3. make possible to mark column mode text by mouse or by using up,down,left,up keys
35
votes
up equal down
Solution #2: add column mode feature as Gedit plugin
Written by grofaty the 26 Jan 09 at 12:27.
There is a unfinished plugin (in development mode since 2007)
http://live.gnome.org/Gedit/Plugins/ColumnMode
and author of this plug-in said he doesn't have time to finish this plug-in. Maybe solution should be provided via plugin if someone has time/idea/knowledge to finish or rewrite new plugin. So sulution #2: write a plugin to add "column mode" feature.
5
votes
up equal down
Solution #3: Multi-edit
Written by shadow_code the 26 Mar 09 at 09:10.
Hi, I'm currently developing an advanced column edit plugin called Multi-edit:
http://jon-walsh.com/journal/multi-edit/

Selection support is still in development, though backspace/delete achieves this for now.

cheers :)
4
votes
up equal down
Solution #4: Column/block menu
Written by jcalleja the 24 Jul 09 at 07:41.
Med editor

One of the best managers column|block editors, we can learn a lot of this great editor.

http://www.utopia-planitia.de/ (runs fine on wine)

Features:

- Dedicated block menĂº.
- Select start/end positions of a block
- Block persistent selection
- Two block modes: line selection/ column selection
- Move a block (very helpful)
- Can paste a copied block where you want in the document.
- Can sort by a column block, sorting the full line
- Macros with blocks
- etc.. , best see in action


See the 14 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 15 Dec 12 at 15:58) >>

Add option to Add/Remove... to filter out GNOME or KDE specific applications  
Written by Yaywalter the 25 Apr 08 at 04:18. Global category: System. New
It would be great if there were a way in the included Add/Remove... program to filter out either GNOME-specific or KDE-specific apps. It's really annoying to stumble upon an application that sounds really cool and/or useful, but then look and see it's for the desktop you don't use.

I use GNOME, and I don't want to see any of the KDE apps.
50
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #7566
Written by Yaywalter the 25 Apr 08 at 04:18.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #7566 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

See the 7 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 7 Dec 12 at 09:14) >>

Change Ubuntu ISO labels - i386 to 32bit and amd64 to 64bit  
Written by oencke the 21 Apr 08 at 19:58. Global category: Installation. New
The i386 ISOs do not have anything to do with Intel or the 386 cpus specifically just as the amd64 are not specific to AMD processors. Additionally these descriptors are practically meaningless to non-techies.

What matters for the decision between the ISOs is the difference between 32bit and 64bit, not intel and amd, so why not just call them that way, and thus take away the burden of having to be a cpu technician to understand them?

EDIT: As a compromise, to avoid confusion of the x86/IA ISOs with those for other architectures, descriptors like PC32bit and PC64bit might also be acceptable as that is likely the maximum a home user knows about his or her computer.
797
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #7370
Written by oencke the 21 Apr 08 at 19:58.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #7370 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!
239
votes
up equal down
Solution #2: Call it "x86-64"
Written by Thelasko the 29 Jan 09 at 14:51.
A minor variant of the solution above, specifying "x86-64" ensures it isn't confused with IA64 and other 64-bit architectures.
676
votes
up equal down
Solution #3: Use "32 bit" and "64 bit" with "details" button.
Written by Darwin Survivor the 20 Feb 10 at 02:56.
Most users would not know that i386 is 32 bit or what the "x86" part of "x86_64" means (or the x for that matter). In order to make this as easy and simple for users as humanly possible, we should simply label them as "64 bit" and "32 bit". Beside the options would be a "details" or "help" button that would:
-explain the differences (max ram, performance, compatibility, etc)
-give a specific version type (i386/x86_64/etc) for advanced users
-give instructions to find out what their machine supports (VERY important)

This makes it industry neutral, while also making it much simpler for non-technical users to figure it out. We are targetting non-technical people after all, so why all the jargon?
-194
votes
up equal down
Solution #4: Use the shorter "x64" instead of "AMD64"
Written by readmanr the 18 Feb 10 at 21:43.
The generic term x86-64 is sometimes shortened to x64 as another vendor-neutral term for x86-64 processors from any company referring to 64bit.
484
votes
up equal down
Solution #5: Use "x86_64" instead of "AMD64"
Written by readmanr the 18 Feb 10 at 21:42.
Redhat, Fedora, Mac OS X, and others simply call 64bit "x86_64". It is a clean, neutral name that is accurate no matter which company made the processor, and also does not give free advertising to either company.
68
votes
up equal down
Solution #6: Automatically check 32/64-bit
Written by jbangert the 23 Feb 10 at 21:34.
Some browsers(in particular one quite popular propietary and Evil product) include the string "x64" in the User Agent on 64-bit hardware (http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/download). We could also provide a platform-dependent download link to a tool that checks for 32-bit / 64-bit ( Windows and Mac mostly - just a simple tool that uses CPUID and then gives a Message Box with 2 links ) .
By default, we should specify 2 download Boxes ( "Ubuntu 32-bit" and "Ubuntu 64-bit" ) giving pros and cons .

See the 24 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 13 Oct 12 at 02:54) >>

Visual feedback for clic on Eject button  
Written by cudjoe the 1 Dec 08 at 09:05. Related project: Nautilus. Not an idea
When the user clics on the Eject button for removable media in Nautilus, there is no visual feedback.

There should be :
- aspect change when pushed (like any GUI button)
- aspect change on mouse over (facultative)
- aspect change while busy

Those details would prevent an impatient user to clic several times, and to make sure his action was taken in account...

301
votes
closed
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #16104
Written by cudjoe the 1 Dec 08 at 09:05.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #16104 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

See the 10 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 22 Sep 12 at 13:19) >>

Separator with name in Gnome Menu  
Written by Otacon87 the 14 Nov 08 at 09:41. Related project: Gnome. Not an idea
Ok, since i think that anyone can say that Gnome Menu is full of icons and it's hard to move properly and fast, i've thought that a way to "better use" the available space in menus is to make some SEPARATORS WITH LABEL.
I.E. Preferences menu is REALLY FULL OF ICONS, so i'd like to subdivide it like this:

http://img510.imageshack.us/my.php?image=proposal1md4.png

It's like Gnome Control Center...but categories are made in menu (i think it's faster to use than Gnome Control Center).

Uh another hint that i thought:
Maybe categories can be "rolled" (i don't know how to say it in english, but the idea is to make labels like treeview:
if you click on label-separator all childs will be hidden showing only the label).
In this way you can show in menu only most used entrys and hide fewest used without deleting them from menus!
-11
votes
closed
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #15616
Written by Otacon87 the 14 Nov 08 at 09:41.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #15616 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

See the 4 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 28 Jun 12 at 15:39) >>

"Not planning to do X" should not be a reason to close an idea.  
Written by csahin the 27 Aug 08 at 15:56. Related project: brainstorm.ubuntu.com. Not an idea
An idea "do X" shouldn't be closed just because "There are no plans to do X." This is the case for idea #525: make thunderbird the default email client.

How can the community describe its wants and needs if the admins close ideas just because Canonical is not planning to change something the community clearly wants.
55
votes
closed
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #12609
Written by csahin the 27 Aug 08 at 15:56.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #12609 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

See the 7 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 23 Jun 12 at 12:04) >>

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... Next >>