Written by rmconard the 7 May 09 at 15:04.

I think a great solution for this is to include multiple desktop environments to simulate other operating systems.

So when a user installs Ubuntu for the first time they should be able to install from 3 major "look and feels."

1) Ubuntu Themed
2) Windows XP Themed
3) Mac OS Themed

This would be a godsend for a lot of new users trying to come over to Linux and want something familiar. That way if they choose the Windows XP theme then Ubuntu will be set up with a Windows style start button and task bar at the bottom.

This should also be separate from Compiz. That way, regardless how you theme your desktop you can still have the option to set up Compiz as you like.

Just an idea, hope you like it.

I think a great solution for this is to include multiple desktop environments to simulate other operating systems. So when a user installs Ubuntu for the first time they should be able to install from 3 major "look and feels." 1) Ubuntu Themed 2) Windows XP Themed 3) Mac OS Themed This would be a godsend for a lot of new users trying to come over to Linux and want something familiar. That way if they choose the Windows XP theme then Ubuntu will be set up with a Windows style start button and task bar at the bottom. This should also be separate from Compiz. That way, regardless how you theme your desktop you can still have the option to set up Compiz as you like. Just an idea, hope you like it.

Written by rmconard the 7 May 09 at 15:09.

If setting it up so users can choose a desktop style from the installation is out of the question, then the next step would be to have DEB packages as optional downloads that can instantly change the look and feel of the desktop to either Windows XP or Mac OS style.

If setting it up so users can choose a desktop style from the installation is out of the question, then the next step would be to have DEB packages as optional downloads that can instantly change the look and feel of the desktop to either Windows XP or Mac OS style.

Written by aadityabhatia the 8 May 09 at 21:49.

Ubuntu is not Windows. Ubuntu is not even "like Windows". Then why make it look cheap by copying Windows' look and feel?

I'd suggest keeping Ubuntu unique the way it is. Use other means to promote Ubuntu so that people get used to it and don't find it complicated anymore.

Check this out for means of helping the mankind understanding the Ubuntu gift: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MarketingTeam

Ubuntu is not Windows. Ubuntu is not even "like Windows". Then why make it look cheap by copying Windows' look and feel? I'd suggest keeping Ubuntu unique the way it is. Use other means to promote Ubuntu so that people get used to it and don't find it complicated anymore. Check this out for means of helping the mankind understanding the Ubuntu gift: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MarketingTeam

Written by choad the 10 May 09 at 13:13.

there are lots of things wrong with all the interfaces around, and ubuntu's is *far* from the best, but that doesn't mean we should copy other people's only half successful attempts. We need to keep evolving our own interface, and make it better than anything else.

there are lots of things wrong with all the interfaces around, and ubuntu's is *far* from the best, but that doesn't mean we should copy other people's only half successful attempts. We need to keep evolving our own interface, and make it better than anything else.

Written by Apiman the 10 May 09 at 19:35.

Although Ubuntu does a remarkable job supporting hardware and configuring the system, it's not unusual to face bugs that we wouldn't accept on a commercial OS. For example, on jaunty, I have to tap on brightness key about 50 times if I want to go from less to most brightness level. Intel graphic driver issues are not acceptable, my X hangs several times during a work day. I think polishing all these issues before releases and hardening support for devices such as HSDPA modems or printers are the things that makes Ubuntu being seeing as an easy desktop environment. In fact, when things work, Ubuntu gives you the best Plug and Play experience. In my opinion better than any other OS.

Although Ubuntu does a remarkable job supporting hardware and configuring the system, it's not unusual to face bugs that we wouldn't accept on a commercial OS. For example, on jaunty, I have to tap on brightness key about 50 times if I want to go from less to most brightness level. Intel graphic driver issues are not acceptable, my X hangs several times during a work day. I think polishing all these issues before releases and hardening support for devices such as HSDPA modems or printers are the things that makes Ubuntu being seeing as an easy desktop environment. In fact, when things work, Ubuntu gives you the best Plug and Play experience. In my opinion better than any other OS.

Written by Claymater the 14 May 09 at 02:17.

If ubuntu (linux) is all about "make it what you want" then why not give them 2 options like...

-Defult (how it is now)
-Single Layout (a mint like menu)

And let it be a option when they right click :)

If ubuntu (linux) is all about "make it what you want" then why not give them 2 options like... -Defult (how it is now) -Single Layout (a mint like menu) And let it be a option when they right click :)

Written by Alpha Uma the 17 May 09 at 12:36.

The default interface (with 2 panels) takes extra screen space: when you use a wide screen (quite common on modern laptops) you end up with a reduced vertical space. So:

1. Gnome panel should be optimized for vertical use
2. Be friendlier to users who wish to set a single panel instead of two
More about point #2: "Gnome Menu Bar" is too wide for a single panel. The alternative, "Gnome Main Menu", would be good, but it is buggy as it takes some seconds to open up.

So my idea is to keep the 3 menus of the main bar, but to do some tweaks too.

- The app menu is already better than Windows: everything is well catalogued, sorted, neat and clean, so I can easily find what I need. Window menus are rather messy to me.

- The "Places" menu text should be changed to just a folder icon or a separated applet: you will save space and make things cleaner.
Items order in this menu should be inverted if the panel is on the bottom, so you can quickly get your home folder (actually you have to move the cursor an half screen)

- The "System" menu text should be replaced as well, maybe by a tools/config icon.

This solution will save more space, while keeping the 3 menus idea, and the icons should be OK alongside of quicklaunch icons.

The default interface (with 2 panels) takes extra screen space: when you use a wide screen (quite common on modern laptops) you end up with a reduced vertical space. So: 1. Gnome panel should be optimized for vertical use 2. Be friendlier to users who wish to set a single panel instead of two More about point #2: "Gnome Menu Bar" is too wide for a single panel. The alternative, "Gnome Main Menu", would be good, but it is buggy as it takes some seconds to open up. So my idea is to keep the 3 menus of the main bar, but to do some tweaks too. - The app menu is already better than Windows: everything is well catalogued, sorted, neat and clean, so I can easily find what I need. Window menus are rather messy to me. - The "Places" menu text should be changed to just a folder icon or a separated applet: you will save space and make things cleaner. Items order in this menu should be inverted if the panel is on the bottom, so you can quickly get your home folder (actually you have to move the cursor an half screen) - The "System" menu text should be replaced as well, maybe by a tools/config icon. This solution will save more space, while keeping the 3 menus idea, and the icons should be OK alongside of quicklaunch icons.

Written by Abstaubaer the 24 May 09 at 10:45.

Only with time I started to accept ubuntu is the way it is and especially with the new releases I learned to love its own way. I support Solution #4 and #5 but I think we should still welcome windows or mac users in a better way and I remember the "desktop tour" that Windows asks you to make when you newly installed the system. Create an interactive tour introducing Ubuntu to new users, regarding the OS they come from.

Only with time I started to accept ubuntu is the way it is and especially with the new releases I learned to love its own way. I support Solution #4 and #5 but I think we should still welcome windows or mac users in a better way and I remember the "desktop tour" that Windows asks you to make when you newly installed the system. Create an interactive tour introducing Ubuntu to new users, regarding the OS they come from.

Written by CaptainLINUX the 26 May 09 at 18:24.

When I first installed ubuntu on my computer, it was a kinfof "shock" Like "What the heck am i supposed to do with this?" But after a day or two i was used to it.

What I think would work best, is that you could set different tool tips.(i think thats what they're called)
But the litte boxes that appear when hover over something.

Like when you hovered over Computer in places it would say
This works like "My Computer" in windows

Or when you hovered over Applications it would say
This is like the start button in windows

Or when you hovered over the system monitor it again would say

This is like the Task-Manager in windows.

This would probably be the best way, mixed with solution 9 to get the windows users ready for ubuntu. You could even do this for The Mac OS only with different tool-tips

When I first installed ubuntu on my computer, it was a kinfof "shock" Like "What the heck am i supposed to do with this?" But after a day or two i was used to it. What I think would work best, is that you could set different tool tips.(i think thats what they're called) But the litte boxes that appear when hover over something. Like when you hovered over Computer in places it would say This works like "My Computer" in windows Or when you hovered over Applications it would say This is like the start button in windows Or when you hovered over the system monitor it again would say This is like the Task-Manager in windows. This would probably be the best way, mixed with solution 9 to get the windows users ready for ubuntu. You could even do this for The Mac OS only with different tool-tips

Written by stepstools the 26 May 09 at 21:57.

I got to test Ubuntu on my grandpa's computer. I think if someone is not able to handle the different environment, when they ran the .ISO CD, they should have first ran the "Try Ubuntu" option first!

I got to test Ubuntu on my grandpa's computer. I think if someone is not able to handle the different environment, when they ran the .ISO CD, they should have first ran the "Try Ubuntu" option first!

Written by weblordpepe the 28 May 09 at 11:48.

Right click the toolbar, click 'Add to panel' and select 'Main Gnome Menu'.

That provides everything under the same button.
You should be able to implement a gnome-toolbar applet which is like a start menu quite easily by copying this applet.

Right click the toolbar, click 'Add to panel' and select 'Main Gnome Menu'. That provides everything under the same button. You should be able to implement a gnome-toolbar applet which is like a start menu quite easily by copying this applet.

Written by cdmdotnet the 31 May 09 at 08:25.

It might need a little further work but there is already a "start menu" look-a-like.
Personally I don't like it - I love gnome as it is - but my wife and mother both found http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.php/Vista+Start+Menu+for+Gnome+Panel?con tent=71425 to be of great help to them in learning ubuntu.
Adding it to the repo is one thing, make it easily found is another thing.
A package that install the gnome panel applet and adds it to the current panel.

It might need a little further work but there is already a "start menu" look-a-like. Personally I don't like it - I love gnome as it is - but my wife and mother both found http://www.gnome-look.org/content/show.php/Vista+Start+Menu+for+Gnome+Panel?content=71425 to be of great help to them in learning ubuntu. Adding it to the repo is one thing, make it easily found is another thing. A package that install the gnome panel applet and adds it to the current panel.

Written by vincenzodentamaro the 3 Jun 09 at 07:22.

It's a solution for make portable programs and improve Linux software sharing.
The idea is 1 Program = 1 executable file.
No installation !
The goal is to allow easy exchange of software between people, which is now impossible on any Linux distros.

See here the main idea:
http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/20108/

It's a solution for make portable programs and improve Linux software sharing. The idea is 1 Program = 1 executable file. No installation ! The goal is to allow easy exchange of software between people, which is now impossible on any Linux distros. See here the main idea: http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/20108/

Written by azhar the 31 Oct 09 at 15:37.

Truth be told, for the majority of people, Linux distros is equal to CLI.
Now, we all know that's false... But, yet, the majority of people do think so...

You know, in my opinion.... I think when someone has a look at a Linux Distro(in that case Ubuntu), he should feel like he wants to embrace the free community at once. What I mean to say, is, that he should be soooo impressed by the background, the Toolbars' design, and the feel in general, that he wishes to go OpenSource almost instantly, and, MOST IMPORTANTLY, this discriminate view against Linux Distros should disappear immediately in his mind.

Now, how do we achieve this??
Its all about the UI.
We should have glassy, and glossy toolbars. And, it should be in very vibrant and lively, and cool colours. It shouldn't be some dull, dark black, or I don't know what colour. It should appeal to the user. It should feel fresh! :)

Moreover, the icons should be stylishly designed. Very beautifully designed. Very trendy, and cool. Again, something that appeals to the user. And not some 2-D clunky and dull-looking icons.

The time has come to show people that the open-communtiy has great resources and talents! Its time to show people that we have taste, not only for stability, or security, even though these are essential components of an OS, but that we also have exquisite taste when it comes to the UI.

Truth be told, for the majority of people, Linux distros is equal to CLI. Now, we all know that's false... But, yet, the majority of people do think so... You know, in my opinion.... I think when someone has a look at a Linux Distro(in that case Ubuntu), he should feel like he wants to embrace the free community at once. What I mean to say, is, that he should be soooo impressed by the background, the Toolbars' design, and the feel in general, that he wishes to go OpenSource almost instantly, and, MOST IMPORTANTLY, this discriminate view against Linux Distros should disappear immediately in his mind. Now, how do we achieve this?? Its all about the UI. We should have glassy, and glossy toolbars. And, it should be in very vibrant and lively, and cool colours. It shouldn't be some dull, dark black, or I don't know what colour. It should appeal to the user. It should feel fresh! :) Moreover, the icons should be stylishly designed. Very beautifully designed. Very trendy, and cool. Again, something that appeals to the user. And not some 2-D clunky and dull-looking icons. The time has come to show people that the open-communtiy has great resources and talents! Its time to show people that we have taste, not only for stability, or security, even though these are essential components of an OS, but that we also have exquisite taste when it comes to the UI. From the moment the user log into his account, to the moment he logs out, he should feel he is in the best OS. He should be excited to explain to his other friends how cool and beautifully designed his OS is. Even the logon tone should be classy. In my opinion, of the best tones is the BOREALIS set. Come'on guys! Lets show to teh world that the OpenSource community has some great talents!! And has exquisite taste!

Written by Mirek2 the 19 Nov 09 at 18:16.

This may be a rewording of sorts to Solution 4, but what the heck.
Ubuntu needs a more well-thought-out UI. I use Xubuntu now, and, even though I tried having the top bar there, I customized it to (kind of) what it's like in Windows -- one bar on the bottom. And when you think about it, it makes a lot more sense: most screens are now very wide, so a lot can fit into a horizontal bar, especially when it can span several rows, when there's just one bar on the bottom, the Fitts law applies to the close button and tabs in Chrome (under Mac OS X, it applies to the menu bar, which is also a clever application of the law), quick access to files and applications really makes most sense as a search in one spot, ...
I'm not saying that the way Ubuntu does things is wrong and other OS's do it right, I'm saying that we need to examine the OS carefully and implement the cleverest and most comfortable solution.

This may be a rewording of sorts to Solution 4, but what the heck. Ubuntu needs a more well-thought-out UI. I use Xubuntu now, and, even though I tried having the top bar there, I customized it to (kind of) what it's like in Windows -- one bar on the bottom. And when you think about it, it makes a lot more sense: most screens are now very wide, so a lot can fit into a horizontal bar, especially when it can span several rows, when there's just one bar on the bottom, the Fitts law applies to the close button and tabs in Chrome (under Mac OS X, it applies to the menu bar, which is also a clever application of the law), quick access to files and applications really makes most sense as a search in one spot, ... I'm not saying that the way Ubuntu does things is wrong and other OS's do it right, I'm saying that we need to examine the OS carefully and implement the cleverest and most comfortable solution.

Written by nillbug the 8 Oct 09 at 23:20.

v

v<d

Written by McIvor the 11 Oct 09 at 03:41.

sdf

sdf<sdf

Written by rrnwexec the 17 Oct 09 at 19:36.

sdf

sdf<sdf

Written by yaknowwat the 18 Oct 09 at 07:49.

sghdfg

sghdfg

Written by alkx4444 the 7 Nov 09 at 01:29.

fgg

fgg

Written by Lyfang the 14 Jun 11 at 07:48.

Ubuntu gets most of its software from Debian (89%)

Source: http://lwn.net/Articles/416667/

Help by sending Ubuntu bugfixes back to Debian upstream and contribute (back to) Debian.

Ubuntu gets most of its software from Debian (89%) Source: http://lwn.net/Articles/416667/ Help by sending Ubuntu bugfixes back to Debian upstream and contribute (back to) Debian.

Written by Murrquan the 28 Feb 08 at 14:42.

Create an attractive boot loader with grubgfx that requires minimal user input and does not scare away new users. If that doesn't work then use Fedora's Plymouth

Create an attractive boot loader with grubgfx that requires minimal user input and does not scare away new users. If that doesn't work then use Fedora's Plymouth

Written by vs8 the 14 Jan 09 at 15:59.

openSUSE and Fedora 10 feature more elaborate art than Ubuntu, I'm not talking about the colors they choose, because I like the Ubuntu colors, it's the art style.

One thing they got right is the boot up. Those distros boot very smooth and they look professional, Ubuntu looks rushed, plain and ugly.

I've seen Fedora boot, and the new plymouth thing rocks, Ubuntu should use it too. It's way better than the actual ugly usplash.

The other thing is the GDM, Ubuntu uses a very old GDM, which is slow. At least on my PC (AMD Phenon 9600 Quad Core, 4gb RAM). The new GDM is smoother, faster and it works fine.

In short, Ubuntu needs eye candy, from boot up to shut down it will attract more people, I guarantee it.

What is Plymouth?

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=fedora_plymouth&num=1

openSUSE and Fedora 10 feature more elaborate art than Ubuntu, I'm not talking about the colors they choose, because I like the Ubuntu colors, it's the art style. One thing they got right is the boot up. Those distros boot very smooth and they look professional, Ubuntu looks rushed, plain and ugly. I've seen Fedora boot, and the new plymouth thing rocks, Ubuntu should use it too. It's way better than the actual ugly usplash. The other thing is the GDM, Ubuntu uses a very old GDM, which is slow. At least on my PC (AMD Phenon 9600 Quad Core, 4gb RAM). The new GDM is smoother, faster and it works fine. In short, Ubuntu needs eye candy, from boot up to shut down it will attract more people, I guarantee it. What is Plymouth? http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=fedora_plymouth&num=1 Screen: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Image:Tours_Fedora10_012_Plymouth_Boot.png openSUSE art: http://www.opensuse.org/screenshots.php New GDM login screen: https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/9/94/Tours_Fedora10_018_Login_Screen.png Thank you.

Written by Felix-Valentine the 12 Jul 09 at 17:26.

to better the user experience, ubuntu should have an animated Splash Screen. a (mini Video) playing, showing the Ubuntu Logo and then a smooth overpass from the splash screen to the loging screen.

to better the user experience, ubuntu should have an animated Splash Screen. a (mini Video) playing, showing the Ubuntu Logo and then a smooth overpass from the splash screen to the loging screen.

Written by MattFinck21 the 21 Jun 09 at 07:18.

i was thinking that ubuntu team should design an default ubuntu grub backround for future releases..or atleast add them to the current ones. after all it would go nice after seeing the linux mint did that.

i was thinking that ubuntu team should design an default ubuntu grub backround for future releases..or atleast add them to the current ones. after all it would go nice after seeing the linux mint did that.

Written by Rodrigo the 12 Jul 09 at 15:31.

Let's stay with the black screen or maybe a screen, but just one to begin with, then with the use of a GUI (the user can download it from the servers) be able to change it without needing to go to the console.
Everybody likes to customize his machine sooner or later.

Let's stay with the black screen or maybe a screen, but just one to begin with, then with the use of a GUI (the user can download it from the servers) be able to change it without needing to go to the console. Everybody likes to customize his machine sooner or later.

Written by tommis the 7 Jan 10 at 02:02.

BURG is a program based-on Grub 2,BURG uses new menu list,screen layout and shortcut keys that all easily customized.

Also see - https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Burg

BURG is a program based-on Grub 2,BURG uses new menu list,screen layout and shortcut keys that all easily customized. <img src="http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/4537/screenshot300x221.png" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us"/><br/> Also see - https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Burg

Written by puzzler995 the 18 Jan 10 at 20:27.

In installation have an option of using either BURG or GRUB with GRUB the Default Option

In installation have an option of using either BURG or GRUB with GRUB the Default Option

Written by lokster the 3 Feb 10 at 14:13.

The developers must make grub2 better. Why use another new and in early development bootloader, while there is already a good one?
Just make the good one even better.

The developers must make grub2 better. Why use another new and in early development bootloader, while there is already a good one? Just make the good one even better.

Written by Theodore the 3 Apr 08 at 19:36.

Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #6344 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

<i>Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #6344 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution.</i><br /> Thanks!

Written by dmritard96 the 22 Aug 09 at 03:40.

I would like to right click on my second harddrive and have an option to mount on boot. I would also like the option to appear in the properties dialogue.

I would like to right click on my second harddrive and have an option to mount on boot. I would also like the option to appear in the properties dialogue.

Written by Akerbos the 23 Aug 09 at 15:16.

Should be clear; no need to clutter the context menue.

Should be clear; no need to clutter the context menue.

Written by Akerbos the 23 Aug 09 at 15:31.

This is a domain where, sadly, only low-level access is possible. It has to be made usable to more users.

This is a domain where, sadly, only low-level access is possible. It has to be made usable to more users.

Written by tholme the 30 Aug 09 at 20:46.

Just automount all drives that can be mounted automatically.

Just automount all drives that can be mounted automatically.

Written by Avantarius the 10 Sep 09 at 15:23.

Save a list of all mounted drives at shutdown. When turned on again the saved mounts are restored automatically so no configuration app or similar is needed. If you don't want a mounted drive to reappear after reboot, just unmount it before computer shutdown!

Save a list of all mounted drives at shutdown. When turned on again the saved mounts are restored automatically so no configuration app or similar is needed. If you don't want a mounted drive to reappear after reboot, just unmount it before computer shutdown!

Written by spocky the 11 Sep 09 at 06:07.

at the moment auto mounting of ressources over wlan is a pain...
sometime the ressources (e.g. NAS over WLAN) are recognised and mounted automatically
sometimes a mount -a is necessary

similarity is given to the shutdown "experience" where sometime ubuntu is waiting for the ressource while it might have been shutdown already

at the moment auto mounting of ressources over wlan is a pain... sometime the ressources (e.g. NAS over WLAN) are recognised and mounted automatically sometimes a mount -a is necessary similarity is given to the shutdown "experience" where sometime ubuntu is waiting for the ressource while it might have been shutdown already

Written by hakaishi the 17 Oct 09 at 08:58.

I think to solve this problem there could be made a second option in the gconf-editor. Something like media_mount_on_systemstart.
And then media_automount should be used only for the automount while media_mount_on_systemstart handles whether the options auto/noauto if fstab are ignored or not.
Another way to solve this would be to let media_automount handle the automount only and let fstab handle the rest.
Right now it's description is as following:
"If set to true, then Nautilus will automatically mount media such as user-visible hard disks and removable media on start-up and media insertion."
I think it should be reduced to:
"If set to true, then Nautilus will automatically mount media such as user-visible hard disks and removable media on insertion."

I think to solve this problem there could be made a second option in the gconf-editor. Something like media_mount_on_systemstart. And then media_automount should be used only for the automount while media_mount_on_systemstart handles whether the options auto/noauto if fstab are ignored or not. Another way to solve this would be to let media_automount handle the automount only and let fstab handle the rest. Right now it's description is as following: "If set to true, then Nautilus will automatically mount media such as user-visible hard disks and removable media on start-up and media insertion." I think it should be reduced to: "If set to true, then Nautilus will automatically mount media such as user-visible hard disks and removable media on insertion."

Written by JoeLeKiffeur the 3 Apr 08 at 20:35.

Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #6354 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

<i>Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #6354 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution.</i><br /> Thanks!

Written by mydoghasworms the 21 Sep 10 at 20:47.

If a user enters his credentials incorrectly, tell him immediately and let him enter them again immediately. No long pause.

If a user enters his credentials incorrectly, tell him immediately and let him enter them again immediately. No long pause.

Written by aliam13_2 the 22 Sep 10 at 09:34.

The first 3 login attempts will return with a failed login message instantly and the 4th and onward fail login attempts the fail message is delayed by 5 or 10 seconds (where the system is blocked for that time). This will allow a genuine user to enter a wrong password with no penalty but still preserve security against brute force attacks.

The first 3 login attempts will return with a failed login message instantly and the 4th and onward fail login attempts the fail message is delayed by 5 or 10 seconds (where the system is blocked for that time). This will allow a genuine user to enter a wrong password with no penalty but still preserve security against brute force attacks.

Written by mydoghasworms the 22 Sep 10 at 10:42.

As pointed out in the comments below, this is in fact a security feature to prevent against brute force attacks. However, I think it is safe to say that probably most desktop users are sitting behind a home router and aren't even directly reachable from the internet. So perhaps this should be a configurable option that should be off by default, but available for extra security if desired.

As pointed out in the comments below, this is in fact a security feature to prevent against brute force attacks. However, I think it is safe to say that probably most desktop users are sitting behind a home router and aren't even directly reachable from the internet. So perhaps this should be a configurable option that should be off by default, but available for extra security if desired.

Written by inkwina the 26 Sep 10 at 11:33.

Leave things as they are as this is a security feature, but make it easy for users who are sloppy at typing passwords to turn this off (or reduce the delay), while warning them that they are disabling (or changing) a security feature.

Strong passwords containing capitals and numbers are easy to mistype when in a hurry, but the delay is mostly frustrating when one is indeed in a hurry.

Leave things as they are as this is a security feature, but make it easy for users who are sloppy at typing passwords to turn this off (or reduce the delay), while warning them that they are disabling (or changing) a security feature. Strong passwords containing capitals and numbers are easy to mistype when in a hurry, but the delay is mostly frustrating when one is indeed in a hurry.

Written by alwuzomondo the 26 Sep 10 at 20:00.

By exponentially increasing the pause between every attempt the first few attempts have hardly noticeable pause, but after many attempts the pause will be very long.
example:
First fail 100ms pause
Second fail 200ms pause
Third fail 400ms pause
Fourth fail 800ms pause
.
.
Tenth fail 102400 ms pause (little over one minute and 40 seconds, but by now it is time to admit that you haven't got a qlue)

By exponentially increasing the pause between every attempt the first few attempts have hardly noticeable pause, but after many attempts the pause will be very long. example: First fail 100ms pause Second fail 200ms pause Third fail 400ms pause Fourth fail 800ms pause . . Tenth fail 102400 ms pause (little over one minute and 40 seconds, but by now it is time to admit that you haven't got a qlue)

Written by Mrinal Saurabh the 7 Oct 10 at 06:06.

Incorrect passwords may be entered due to keyboard errors, or you forgot your password or may be someone else reset it.The password should be changed and posted to the email ID entered in user account, and the user should allowed to start the system in a guest mode, so that he an connect to internet and access it.

Incorrect passwords may be entered due to keyboard errors, or you forgot your password or may be someone else reset it.The password should be changed and posted to the email ID entered in user account, and the user should allowed to start the system in a guest mode, so that he an connect to internet and access it.

Written by Henne91 the 10 Oct 10 at 20:36.

Leave it like it is now. This pause was introduced for security reasons and prevents somebody from hijacking your system. If you accidently enter a wrong password the time might seem very long but it's actually not too long and increases the system's security.

Even if you only make a long pause after the third attempt or increase the pause exponential this will decrease security.

Leave it like it is now. This pause was introduced for security reasons and prevents somebody from hijacking your system. If you accidently enter a wrong password the time might seem very long but it's actually not too long and increases the system's security. Even if you only make a long pause after the third attempt or increase the pause exponential this will decrease security.

Written by joerlend the 14 Oct 10 at 18:04.

I think one reason why people find this annoying, is that they don't understand the security issues. If there was a label "Security delay", possibly with a counter, then it'd feel more responsive.

I think one reason why people find this annoying, is that they don't understand the security issues. If there was a label "Security delay", possibly with a counter, then it'd feel more responsive.

Written by cembree the 29 Feb 08 at 14:42.

Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #1448 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

<i>Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #1448 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution.</i><br /> Thanks!

Written by rlopez the 15 Oct 10 at 20:18.

The login box could be either placed in a randomly different location on the screen each time it opens or it could move around until it is selected for use.

The login box could be either placed in a randomly different location on the screen each time it opens or it could move around until it is selected for use.

Written by philipk88 the 16 Oct 10 at 11:47.

Moving the box would mess up the symmetry, just displaying a regular screensaver after a minute or two, maybe the one used by the last person to log in, would fix the problem.

Moving the box would mess up the symmetry, just displaying a regular screensaver after a minute or two, maybe the one used by the last person to log in, would fix the problem.

Written by ml2 the 24 Jan 09 at 15:58.

Implement a progress-bar which shows the password strength in the installer and user management tool.

Low strength = red;
middle strength = orange;
hight strength = green.

Thanks to Peter Koopman, who originally came up with the idea.

Implement a progress-bar which shows the password strength in the installer and user management tool. Low strength = red; middle strength = orange; hight strength = green. Thanks to Peter Koopman, who originally came up with the idea.

Written by gargouille the 30 Jan 09 at 02:55.

Solution #1 is an excellent idea. I think this could be expanded to have options for a password policy. These options could be available in System > Administration > Users and Groups. Check box options: (require uppercase & lowercase letters, require combination of numeric and alpha). A drop down box could also be added for the required minimum password size.

Solution #1 is an excellent idea. I think this could be expanded to have options for a password policy. These options could be available in System > Administration > Users and Groups. Check box options: (require uppercase & lowercase letters, require combination of numeric and alpha). A drop down box could also be added for the required minimum password size.