<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Ubuntu brainstorm]]></title>
    <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Post your ideas and vote for the entries you like. Please read the posting <b><a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Brainstorm">guidelines</a></b> and <b><a href="http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/advanced_search">check</a></b> if your idea has been posted already! ]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22-Nov-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22-Nov-2008 00:00:00 UTC</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
 

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[136] Make ubuntu low-resolution compatible.]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/447/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[It's impossible to modify anything in ubuntu with resolutions under 1024x768.<br />My PC has a CRT monitor, with a max resolution of 1024x768, but only at a 60hz refresh rate, so i have to run it in 800x600.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22-Nov-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/447/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[126] Special version for countries without software patents]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/1396/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[A lot of things that are really needed for a nice desktop experience are crippled because of american software patents. It's very annoying to have to recompile freetype, install codecs and other things to get to the point where the system is usable (for me), just because of software patents which aren't even applicable where I live.<br /><br />I'm pretty sure that just about every non-american would LOVE a special version of Ubuntu where these things are default. It would be perfectly legal also, similar to the old -non-US versions of Debian.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22-Nov-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/1396/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[2355] Brainstorm: Don't start with most popular, and hide grades until requested]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/203/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Change start page of Brainstorm to show latest ideas or something, else people will probably push for the already high-graded ideas and won't care of other newer ideas.<br /><br />Maybe a page with random ideas?<br /><br />And remove the grades if not specifically requested, since it will affect peoples voting.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197019"> Bug #197019</a> : [Information on this bug will be retrieved soon]<br/>



]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22-Nov-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/203/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1246] Delta (patch based) updates]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/13/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Summary:<br />Ability to download only changed bits of files and use much less bandwidth.<br />Scope and Use Cases:<br />Ann has slow internet connection. She sees that there are 150MB of updates and decides not to update at all leaving her with vulnerable and buggy system.<br />Implementation Plan:<br />Adopt it from Debian?<br /><br />Previously discussed here, but still not implemented: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=409916<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21837"> Bug #21837</a> : [Information on this bug will be retrieved soon]<br/>

<a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/apt-sync"> Blueprint apt-sync:</a> [Information on this blueprint will be retrieved soon]<br/>

<a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=579455"> Ubuntuforums.org thread #579455</a>
<br/>

]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22-Nov-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/13/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[949] Super-slick boot]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/37/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Improve the boot sequence to reduce the number of mode switches and jarring look and feel changes. While our current boot sequence has evolved beyond a verbose scroll of text on the console, it is still not as elegant as it could be. Increased elegance would result in a much improved user experience, and increase user confidence in the distribution.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />

<a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/slick-boot"> Blueprint slick-boot:</a> [Information on this blueprint will be retrieved soon]<br/>


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22-Nov-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/37/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[4940] Speed Up Ubuntu-Gnome boot time]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/42/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I guess everybody has experienced the rather long boot up times in Ubuntu (particularly with laptops). I know they are already working on it, but the change from feisty to gutsy was a pain in the ass in terms of boot up speed.<br />A default WinXP installation beats Ubuntu's boot up time by far!! That shouldn't be allowed fellas!!<br /><br />I therefore propose to the development team (both Ubuntu and by extension Gnome)to work on the improvement of boot up times in Ubuntu systems.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />

<a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/jaunty-boot-performance"> Blueprint jaunty-boot-performance:</a> [Information on this blueprint will be retrieved soon]<br/>

<a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=585635"> Ubuntuforums.org thread #585635</a>
<br/>

]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22-Nov-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/42/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[4037] Start taking advantage of Upstart]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/35/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Replace initscripts with upstart events. Our boot sequence is currently slow, full of race conditions and poor interactions, especially with competition between the series of tasks run by sysv-rc, udev and sometimes just with the kernel. We developed upstart so that we could have a truly event driven boot sequence that would be fast, reliable and flexible; we should take advantage of it.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />

<a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/replacement-initscripts"> Blueprint replacement-initscripts:</a> [Information on this blueprint will be retrieved soon]<br/>


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22-Nov-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/35/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[4444] Professional-looking bootloader]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/21/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Ubuntu's bootloader is a stark black and white screen, filled with confusing options. It gives newbies a moment of indecision, as they try to figure out if they are supposed to choose something, and wonder why there are three or four Ubuntus listed. Then the timer finishes counting down (starting from 10), and the newb begins to feel like he's getting in over his head as his PC boots into Ubuntu.<br /><br />Too much information up front, stark text-only display, painfully long countdown timer. What would be the alternative? Well, when a Fedora PC is booted up, the first thing the user sees is a graphical splash screen, and "Booting into Fedora (kernel version) in 4 seconds ... " The user can press a key to interrupt and select from kernel versions or alternative operating systems, or just let it boot into Fedora.<br /><br />Can't we create our own attractive bootloader? Or, failing that, copy-and-paste Fedora's?<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3339"> Bug #3339</a> : [Information on this bug will be retrieved soon]<br/>

<a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/use-grubgfx"> Blueprint use-grubgfx:</a> [Information on this blueprint will be retrieved soon]<br/>

<a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=208855"> Ubuntuforums.org thread #208855</a>
<br/>

]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22-Nov-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/21/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[5593] Provide a simple graphical interface to manage _any_ type of network connection]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/4/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[At the moment it's possible to manage traditional wired and WiFi connections using Network Manager. To connect via a modem, a 3G/GPRS card, over bluetooth to a cell phone or via USB to another device requires that the user installs extra packages, and does a fair amount of configuration that isn't found in Network Manager.<br /><br />A single unified tool should be provided which allows the user to connect to a network (or internet) via any supported method. It would also be useful to provide an extension to this tool to manage firewall rules and network connection sharing.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />

<a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/gprs-connection-out-of-the-box"> Blueprint gprs-connection-out-of-the-box:</a> [Information on this blueprint will be retrieved soon]<br/>


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22-Nov-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/4/</guid>
    </item>


  </channel>
</rss>

