<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Ubuntu brainstorm]]></title>
    <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Post your ideas and vote for the entries you like. Please read the posting <b><a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Brainstorm">guidelines</a></b> and <b><a href="http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/advanced_search">check</a></b> if your idea has been posted already! ]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02-Dec-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02-Dec-2008 00:00:00 UTC</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
 

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[339] Improve Startup by implementing Fedora's Plymouth]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/11165/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Fedora is currently working on improving the startup experience by implementing Plymouth:<br />http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureBetterStartup<br /><br />By doing this, transition from Grub to GDM (or KDM or whatever) would be done almost instantly. Plymouth will use a graphical boot mode with a fallback method to text for those computers that don't have hardware support.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />

<a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/plymouth"> Blueprint plymouth:</a> [Information on this blueprint will be retrieved soon]<br/>


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02-Dec-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/11165/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[-24] Port applications to Windows]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/14030/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I'm aware of this getting a lot of negative votes, but it seems to me as a good idea. The other problem is that it could be an dupe. But I'll take the risk.<br />===============<br />Prologue:<br />I recently installed Windows back on my computer (don't ask why). And I Noticed that I would really like to have some of the Linux apps on my Windows. Off course this was to some extent possible with KDE4.1.1 for windows, but there are "millions" of apps that are not ported to Windows.<br /><br />Why is this a good idea?<br />Because of Firefox, OpenOffice and GIMP. All of these programs are free and GIMP was made especially for Linux and then ported to windows.<br />With more application that were developed for Linux ported to Windows, Linux will get a bit of limelight with them.<br />Meaning that someone is interested in Linux but isn't sure if this would be a good decision they could be persuaded with known apps that they were used to have in Windows.<br />One of apps that I know that it would be a really good for windows is K3b (but I know it will be ported in future when KDE4 for Windows reach stable state). I'm sure that there are other products that you can't imagine living without them.<br />==================================================<br />!Main idea!:<br />I know that porting all of the apps is an daunting task, so there is a simple and effective solution to this problem.<br />What "we" need is an "anti-wine" that's in "opposite direction" as Wine. So there should be a program which would provide a compatibility layer to Linux apps in Windows. I know this is probably very hard to program, probably even harder than wine was (as Linux uses totally different approach to organizing files as Windows). But in a long run this is still easier than porting one app at the time.<br />So you could just download tar.bz file and the "anti-wine" would compile it for you and install it on your computer. It should also support deb and rpm files.<br />================================================<br />So why should Canonical do this and how is this helping Ubuntu?<br />I know that Canonical first obligation is Ubuntu and its flavours but this could be a way to promote Ubuntu and Linux.<br />This "anti-wine" wold be developed by Canonical and under about there could be a section "our other products" that would also have a link to Ubuntu and other flavours home pages.<br /><br />I hope I was clear enough and that you agree that this is a good idea. And hope it's not a dupe.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02-Dec-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/14030/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[28] Ubuntu Search Part 2 - Tracker Metadata in Nautilus]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/14506/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[PLEASE TAKE THE TIME TO READ FULLY BEFORE VOTING<br /><br />This is part 2 of an epic series of ideas on how to make search in Ubuntu not suck. For part 1 <a href="http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/14394/">click here</a>. In this idea we look at how to integrate Tracker metadata into Nautilus (the file browser).<br /><br />When a file in Nautilus is selected, the status bar should expand to show information about the file, including editable tracker metadata. The matadata could be context sensitive, and include tags, as well as ratings, artist, and genre information for music, author and title for PDFs, etc.<br /><br />Some of this metadata should be directly editable in the status bar. (I say *some* because it makes sense for ratings, but not song play counts etc).<br /><br />As discussed in the <a href="http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/14394/">previous idea</a>, exposing the metadata to the user in an intuitive manner will greatly enhance usability. For example: without the use of any music player, one could generate a playlist of top rated songs simply by typing the following into Nautilus' search bar: "*.mp3 rating:5". That is, list all songs with a rating of 5 stars. And remember that songs can be rated directly in Nautilus!<br /><br />If the idea of <a href="http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/1981/">smart search folders</a> is incorporated with this, one could simply set up virtual search folders for top 10 played songs, recently accessed files of filetype:pdf, etc. Just spend some time thinking about various scenarios where this would be useful to you. Imagine the organizational power that you get at your finger tips! And how intuitive this would be!<br /><br />In the next idea in this series we'll look at further integrating Tracker with applications. Stay tuned :)<br /><br />Read and vote on <a href="http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/14394/">Part 1</a> and <a href="http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/14598/">Part 3</a> here!<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02-Dec-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/14506/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[-5] Desktop-wide GUI tool to control network resource usage]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/74/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Right now, setting download speeds in applications is a common necessity for working with a shared Internet connection. However, no two applications present that option the same way, and some don't present it at all! It is also an option that, when available, must be accessed very often.<br /><br />I recently discovered a number of neat tools that fix this for me. One of them is called "wondershaper", which lets me change the downstream and upstream speed for a particular device, on the fly, for everything. The results are instant and quite satisfying.<br />There were other tools that could do the same idea for particular processes. It stood out to me that they all demanded to run the process themselves, but it doesn't seem like it would be impossible to selectively shape networking for a process once it is running.<br /><br />One major benefit of the graphical user interface is that windows can be traced directly to processes. In this way, the user can select a window and have a program know exactly what process to kill / limit.<br /><br />Granted, moving network speed limiting outwards sounds weird. How dare we pull control from the applications?<br />Actually, this is already being done for many other kinds of resource! That is what "nice" is all about, for example. The difference here is that this would be a "nice" control for resources outside of the local ones, which we may not necessarily see. That is what the window management stuff is all about, with reserving space that programs can draw to. We are not expecting the program to manage system resources for us; the program just has to go with the flow, and the operating system keeps it all organized as the end user would like.<br /><br />How to implement it?<br />This would be an upstream type of thing. Somebody will have to persuade the GNOME people. I think, done right, this would be a positive adjustment for GNOME since it simplifies the user interface in the way we like, while adding functionality across the desktop. No longer must you hunt across menus to find out how to limit network resource usage in Download Tool X; it is always in the same place. Big, big plus for usability, and that's not even counting the benefit of easily controlling network usage for the forward-thinking applications that don't think to include the option!<br />Yes, those programs are forward-thinking just as an application like Scribes which does not concern itself with organizing its windows; they expect the operating system to handle what it should, leaving the task entirely up to it. These programs are not back seat drivers.<br /><br />My thought would be a few additions to NetworkManager. One would be a slider somewhere that can be dragged to set a global download limit for a device. Then another option would allow the user to specify download limit for a particular process, with an interface much like xkill (except with an extra dialog afterwards).<br />Another possibility is that global and per-application network shaping could be built in to the System Monitor, although setting things through there has always seemed out of scope to me. Still, it has an interface to kill and set priority for processes, so changing network usage doesn't seem a huge stretch.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196439"> Bug #196439</a> : [Information on this bug will be retrieved soon]<br/>

<a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/gui-bandwidth-limit-with-schedule"> Blueprint gui-bandwidth-limit-with-schedule:</a> [Information on this blueprint will be retrieved soon]<br/>

<a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=459132"> Ubuntuforums.org thread #459132</a>
<br/>

]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02-Dec-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/74/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[57] interactive getting started with ubntu]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/14181/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[There was recently an article that return rate of linux netbooks was higher<br /><br />http://blog.laptopmag.com/ubuntu-confirms-linux-netbook-returns-higher-than-anticpated<br /><br />“Unclear selling is happening, typically online. The customer will get their netbook sent to their home and they imagine to find something like a Microsoft desktop, but they see a brown Ubuntu version. They are unwilling to learn it and they were expecting to have Windows.”<br /><br />therefore i purpose a interactive app which tells different settings and features in ubuntu like getting started in xp<br /><br />-it should be the first app to start<br />-there should be option to disable it<br />-there should be the option to remove it from desktop useful for netbooks were space is less<br />-it should link to online or should have installed updating database of hardware that is compatiable<br />  webcams<br />  printer<br />  tv tuner<br />  scanner<br />  bluetooth<br />  usb devices <br />database should be user update able but should be maintained by canonical in professional manner  <br /><br /><br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02-Dec-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/14181/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[193] Clearer Laptop Power Savings]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/13330/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Powertop is kind of confusing, and it seems like actions taken with it expire after some time. Something graphical and permanent would be preferable, built into power management.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02-Dec-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/13330/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[38] Have TimeVault installed by default]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/7185/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Now I know there are couple of TimeVault BrainStorm ideas, one is improve the interface (http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/3282/) and the other is to improve it (http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/idea/5781/).  I like both of them, but what my idea is, is to have TimeVault installed by default and have the user setup it up when they want to.  This would be a good point to make to the user that you can backup your files in a timely manner and with a very good powerful tool, similar to what Apple has done with Leopard and TimeMachine.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02-Dec-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/7185/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[106] Synaptic Version Restore]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/5786/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Currently, if you upgrade a package from a third-party repository (for instance, Sid), Synaptic cannot automatically downgrade it to a stable, supported version--you have to uninstall it and reinstall it from the Ubuntu repository. This can cause problems, especially if you try upgrading something with a lot of dependencies and want to bring it back to a stable version. I propose an option to allow Synaptic to "restore" packages and to the latest official Ubuntu release.<br /><br />It would also downgrade packages that depend on a specific version of another package, or prompt the user to remove them if they are not in the official repositories.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02-Dec-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/5786/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[440] Create a "How Can I Help?" site]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/5991/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I think, a lot of people like to help with ubuntu development, but they don't know where to start. This includes not only programmers but also designers, music composers or just the normal ubuntu user.<br /><br />So how about creating a website "howcanihelp.ubuntu.com" where everyone (except for C/C++ programmers ;-) ) can find out how to contribute?<br /><br />Examples:<br />PHP Programmer -> help with Brainstorm Development, someproject.ubuntu.com needs a new Website, ...<br />Music Composer -> (don't know where this should link)<br />Graphic Artist -> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork<br />Foreign Language Native Speaker -> Translate Subtitles at screencasts.ubuntu.com,...<br />Beginner Ubuntu User -> (don't know if we find something for them :-) )<br />Advanced Ubuntu User -> Help people at IRC #ubuntu, https://help.ubuntu.com/community/WikiToDo, join the Documentation Team...<br />Marketing Expert -> ...<br /><br /><br />and so on!<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02-Dec-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/5991/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[447] All Ubuntu websites pass W3C specs]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/6339/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[It's silly to be pushing open standards when we don't follow them for our own sites.  <br /><br />All Ubuntu websites should pass the W3C validation checks:<br />http://www.ubuntu.com/  4 Errors<br />https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ 12 Errors<br />http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/ 311 Errors<br />https://launchpad.net/ 5 Errors<br />http://releases.ubuntu.com/ 17 Errors<br /><br />Some of these are really simple fixes, but showing that we care about open standards is priceless.<br /><br />For reference, others that fail:<br />Microsoft, Sun, KDE fail. Novell and Apple fail with 1 Error.<br /><br />Those that pass:<br />Red Hat, opensuse, Debian, Fedora, Linux Mint, Gnome, Opera, Firefox and OpenOffice.org<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02-Dec-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/6339/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[157] Compete with directx]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/365/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Ubuntu should develop it's own open source game development libraries.  This could push for a unified way to develop games on Linux platforms.  Fast ANSI C libs that don't act as an engine, but rather as a easy way to gain access to the systems hardware from languages like python,c++,java...   Why should Windows attract all the game developers. If a standardized library is developed for Linux it would certainly make anyone Question the need to use Directx.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02-Dec-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/365/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[273] Bring Computer Clock NTP Internet synchronization back!]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/5374/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[***Update - I believe this has been fixed/implemented*** <br /><br /><br />In Gutsy we had the ability to synchronize our computer clock with that of an internet server, to keep accurate time.<br /><br />With Hardy Heron, that feature has been lost. :(<br /><br />This may not seem like a big deal, but it is, because daylight savings time came early for us. My Ubuntu clock is two hours behind, because the new timezone clock feature thinks it's a different time. If I could synchronize with an internet server, I could fix this problem. <br /><br />----------------------------------------------<br />http://tf.nist.gov/service/its.htm<br /><br />Set Your Computer Clock Via the Internet<br />NIST Internet Time Service (ITS)<br /><br />The NIST Internet Time Service (ITS) allows users to synchronize computer clocks via the Internet. The time information provided by the service is directly traceable to UTC(NIST). The service responds to time requests from any Internet client in several formats including the DAYTIME, TIME, and NTP protocols.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205361"> Bug #205361</a> : [Information on this bug will be retrieved soon]<br/>



]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02-Dec-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/5374/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[36] Wired 802.1x authentication (home dir on remote host)]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/2739/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In many companies, the home directory is stored in a server (NFS, samba).<br />Thus, it would be interesting some integration with gdm (kdm) so that make the authentication of network authentication before the operating system authentication.<br />An example of this functionality happens with use of the windows and securew2.<br />My ideia is: create a checkbox in gdm or in networkmanager with "Enable 802.1x authentication with remote home dir".<br />With this function, xsupplicant uses the gdm user and pass to make the 802.1x auth instead the hardcode user and pass from the /etc/xsupplicant.conf.<br />Important: the auth of the operating system (ubuntu) is in ldap, and home dir is in samba or nfs.<br />The network auth is necessary because only after 802.1x authentication other protocols are allowed (for example: ldap, samba, nfs, http, ftp).<br /><br />Tiago<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02-Dec-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/2739/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[278] Add option to throttle speed of Synaptic and Update Manager]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/553/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Usually what keeps me from updating is just the bandwidth.  I don't like to update if I'm not going to be nearby to address any issues that arise, and I don't like to have all my bandwidth (which isn't so great) taken up by a 200MB set of updates.<br /><br />I would like to see the ability to throttle how much bandwidth the update process takes.  Also, having the ability to do this in Synaptic would make it much nicer for when you wish to download some of the bigger games.<br /><br /><br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02-Dec-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/553/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[150] Give a discription as to what a terminal is.]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/5996/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[When you press ctrl alt f1 ect you get a terminal indepenant of X and is wonderfull if you know what your doing, but say my mum accadentally presses ctrl alt f1. Not knowing really what she is doing or the cat lands on the keyboard and puts it into a terminal. She would think the computer is broken and be very confused on how to fix it I think we should put a discription as to what it is and how to get back to X<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02-Dec-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/5996/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[117] How to make Ubuntu alternative of any MS OS in IT industry and Corporate World?]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/5907/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Hello All,<br /><br />I am working in a multi national IT company having over 10 millions employees and top 7 Global top 10 firms as the clients incluing GE,IBM etc.<br /><br />I got the chance to understand what should an OS contain to being accepted by any corporate enterprice ?<br /><br />Ubuntu is having many essential features like securety, regular updates release,support availibility,office suit, mail like evolution, native languages etc. and also offers advantages like less need to antivirus,lower configuration of HW support etc. but I am not sure weather Ubuntu offers certain most important features like..<br /><br />1) Integrated or Supported VPN client- In any company most employees works from home so connecting to office network especially in US and Europe it is most important thing.<br /><br />2) Connectivity SoftWare like Citrix clint or Tuxedo- In any organization many CRM,ERP tools like clarify,SAP etc.. are used and to access their thick clients from local machines we need Software like Citrix and Tuxedo so incorporating these will them will be great advantage.<br /><br />I think rest is included in Ubuntu. Please provide your feed back if am skipping something to promote Ubuntu the real alternative to MicroSoft Os.<br /><br />Thanks<br /><br /><br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02-Dec-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/5907/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[50] Medibuntu Repository in 8.04 "Hardy Heron"]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/5818/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Medibuntu is now available for all Ubuntu 'family' except "Hardy Heron". Should be also available there.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02-Dec-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/5818/</guid>
    </item>


  </channel>
</rss>

