<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Ubuntu brainstorm]]></title>
    <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Post your ideas and vote for the entries you like. Please read the posting <b><a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Brainstorm">guidelines</a></b> and <b><a href="http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/advanced_search">check</a></b> if your idea has been posted already! ]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13-Oct-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13-Oct-2008 00:00:00 UTC</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
 

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[710] Easy file sharing between local users]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/3916/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Currently there is no way to easily share files between multiple local users. I am talking about full read-write access to particular folder, eg. music folder.<br /><br />Example: Alice and Bob uses the same computer. Alice has read access to Bob's home folder. Bob has read access to Alice's home folder. They want to fully share (read/write) their music. So they should ideally create /home/music folder, put all the music there and use it. Everything Bob puts into there, Alice should be able to read and remove, and vice versa. This is currently impossible in Ubuntu. Bob has to manually fix permissions every time Alice wants to delete something Bob's (Bob creates /home/music/Britney, but Alice can't delete /home/music/Britney/song1.mp3).<br /><br />I have discussed this issue with several linux gurus and there is currently no easy nor difficult way to achieve this in Linux on the same (ext3) partition. With every proposed solution I can give you counterexample (group permissions, ACLs, local Samba, local NFS, etc - there is always problem when moving files). There would have to be created utility to set shared folders and some daemon would have to monitor changes and modify permissions.<br /><br />Currently the easiest solution known for me is to share files on separate (ironically) NTFS partition, because when mounting NTFS you can force user/group/permissions on file access. What a shame, we use Microsoft technologies just to share files between Ubuntu users.<br /><br />This problem is quite serious, give it a thought or two. Everyone who is not using Ubuntu computer alone and wants to share music/films/etc between multiple users knows what I am talking about.<br /><br />//New info:<br />Atany has proposed in the comment that BindFS project can be used to achieve this functinality:<br />http://code.google.com/p/bindfs/<br />I have tried it and it works very well. Developers which would like to implement this idea should have a look on BindFS, it's very promising tool, it could provide all necessary background for this.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />

<a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/local-file-share"> Blueprint local-file-share:</a> [Information on this blueprint will be retrieved soon]<br/>


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13-Oct-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/3916/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[441] Make so other people cant access your home directory]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/6106/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I created a new Guest account, then I stripped it of all user privileges.<br /><br />Then I found out, that it could access all MY private data files in MY home directory.<br /><br />Please fix it so that other users cannot read the home directories of other people. This is a breech of privacy.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209292"> Bug #209292</a> : [Information on this bug will be retrieved soon]<br/>



]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13-Oct-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/6106/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[393] Applications that stop 'responding' should get less CPU]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/5806/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[This can be implemented by doing a renice on any CPU-hogging processes that don't catch SIGXCPU.<br />This would be easy to implement, would improve responsiveness, and wouldn't break anything.<br />Similar functionality has been available on W*****s for some time with the ForumWare program "ProcessTamer".<br />This suggestion is an intentional duplicate, but with a less technical title.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13-Oct-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/5806/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[64] Make "recovery point"]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/6262/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[It would be nice to let users create "recovery points".. Sure if something bad happens you can always reinstall all from the beginning and use other backups (if u'v made any) but wouldn't it be nice if there was a possibility for users to make "recovery points" to be able to get there systems back fast. Settings and a list of all packages that ware installed which automatically gets downloaded again when the user recovers the system.. Option to burn the recovery on a CD at once or save an image somewhere.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13-Oct-2008 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/6262/</guid>
    </item>


  </channel>
</rss>

