Ubuntu QA:
BlogBrainstorm
Log in
Ubuntu QA
The Ubuntu community has contributed 11092 ideas, 50731 comments, 1079046 votes

Contributor TBH




up
412
down
Make so other people cant access your home directory  
Restrict access to users home directory to account
owner (#209292)


In : ubuntu
Status : New
Importance : Undecided
Assignee :
0 comments, 4 subscribers and 0 duplicates
bug
Written by Eldmannen the 30 Mar 08 at 16:57. Category: Security. Related to: Nothing/Others. New
I created a new Guest account, then I stripped it of all user privileges.

Then I found out, that it could access all MY private data files in MY home directory.

Please fix it so that other users cannot read the home directories of other people. This is a breech of privacy.

See the 37 comments (latest comment the 21 Jul 08 at 12:30) >>

up
635
down
Easy file sharing between local users  
Ubuntu

In :  
Priority : Undefined
Definition : Discussion (Needs guidance)
Implementation : Not started
Assignee :
spec
Written by kamil.paral the 8 Mar 08 at 21:20. Category: Accessibility. Related to: Nothing/Others. New
Currently there is no way to easily share files between multiple local users. I am talking about full read-write access to particular folder, eg. music folder.

Example: Alice and Bob uses the same computer. Alice has read access to Bob's home folder. Bob has read access to Alice's home folder. They want to fully share (read/write) their music. So they should ideally create /home/music folder, put all the music there and use it. Everything Bob puts into there, Alice should be able to read and remove, and vice versa. This is currently impossible in Ubuntu. Bob has to manually fix permissions every time Alice wants to delete something Bob's (Bob creates /home/music/Britney, but Alice can't delete /home/music/Britney/song1.mp3).

I have discussed this issue with several linux gurus and there is currently no easy nor difficult way to achieve this in Linux on the same (ext3) partition. With every proposed solution I can give you counterexample (group permissions, ACLs, local Samba, local NFS, etc - there is always problem when moving files). There would have to be created utility to set shared folders and some daemon would have to monitor changes and modify permissions.

Currently the easiest solution known for me is to share files on separate (ironically) NTFS partition, because when mounting NTFS you can force user/group/permissions on file access. What a shame, we use Microsoft technologies just to share files between Ubuntu users.

This problem is quite serious, give it a thought or two. Everyone who is not using Ubuntu computer alone and wants to share music/films/etc between multiple users knows what I am talking about.

//New info:
Atany has proposed in the comment that BindFS project can be used to achieve this functinality:
http://code.google.com/p/bindfs/
I have tried it and it works very well. Developers which would like to implement this idea should have a look on BindFS, it's very promising tool, it could provide all necessary background for this.

Developer comments
The proposed inotify/chmod hack in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LocalFileShare would probably work to some degree, but I think it is subject to race conditions, and also not very flexible.

A slightly better solution would IMHO be to provide the shared directory through FUSE; then we can impose dynamic size limitations (at most use 2/3 of the available space in /home, etc.), fine-grained dynamic permissions, and avoid a lot of inotifying and permission race conditions.

Once this is solved and provided by default, we should reconsider "#6106: Make so other people cant access your home directory", which we didn't do yet in order for people to be able to share files r/o.

See the 36 comments (latest comment the 3 Jul 08 at 22:50) >>

up
377
down
Applications that stop 'responding' should get less CPU  
Written by bescritt the 27 Mar 08 at 00:30. Category: System. Related to: Nothing/Others. New
This can be implemented by doing a renice on any CPU-hogging processes that don't catch SIGXCPU.
This would be easy to implement, would improve responsiveness, and wouldn't break anything.
Similar functionality has been available on W*****s for some time with the ForumWare program "ProcessTamer".
This suggestion is an intentional duplicate, but with a less technical title.

See the 8 comments >>

up
64
down
Make "recovery point"  
Written by Novus the 2 Apr 08 at 07:27. Category: Installation. Related to: Nothing/Others. New
It would be nice to let users create "recovery points".. Sure if something bad happens you can always reinstall all from the beginning and use other backups (if u'v made any) but wouldn't it be nice if there was a possibility for users to make "recovery points" to be able to get there systems back fast. Settings and a list of all packages that ware installed which automatically gets downloaded again when the user recovers the system.. Option to burn the recovery on a CD at once or save an image somewhere.

See the 6 comments >>