Contributor Penguin Guy
728
votes
757
18
29
117
votes
163
33
46
Solution #2:
Use "easy" words and complex ones between ()
Written by
Ssdg the 30 Mar 10 at 09:46.
As you can see on #1 the interface uses words like: "set user ID"
It's a bit complex for low level users. We need them to get as quickly as possible what a checkbox means. For exemple:
Set user ID will become : "the program will have same rights as the owner has(set user ID)"
As you can see on #1 the interface uses words like: "set user ID"
It's a bit complex for low level users. We need them to get as quickly as possible what a checkbox means. For exemple:
Set user ID will become : "the program will have same rights as the owner has(set user ID)"
394
votes
425
17
31
Solution #3:
Add "Become root" button
Written by
la_serpe the 31 Mar 10 at 09:29.
It's impossible to change some options in this menu, unless you are root. There is no way to become root through GUI. This should change.
It's impossible to change some options in this menu, unless you are root. There is no way to become root through GUI. This should change.
134
votes
153
28
19
Solution #4:
'set default rights' button
Add a button which assigns the most useful and common rights to the selected item (recursively if it's a directory).
that would be rw-r--r-- for files and rwxr-xr-x for folders.
this would be very useful for example if you copy files from lesser advanced filesystems like the ones used in windows which don't have rights management (they are often set to wrong values like 777 then)
just one button - one click - which sets the default rights. so the user is safe and doesn't even have to know anything about rights management.
Add a button which assigns the most useful and common rights to the selected item (recursively if it's a directory).
that would be rw-r--r-- for files and rwxr-xr-x for folders.
this would be very useful for example if you copy files from lesser advanced filesystems like the ones used in windows which don't have rights management (they are often set to wrong values like 777 then)
just one button - one click - which sets the default rights. so the user is safe and doesn't even have to know anything about rights management.
189
votes
206
14
17
Solution #5:
Add the actual owner/group names for clarity.
Instead of using
Owner: Read, etc
Group: Read, etc
Others: Read, etc
Why not list the actual owner/group of the file?
Owner (Joe): Read, etc
Group (users): Read, etc
Others: Read, etc.
Instead of using
Owner: Read, etc
Group: Read, etc
Others: Read, etc
Why not list the actual owner/group of the file?
Owner (Joe): Read, etc
Group (users): Read, etc
Others: Read, etc.
-98
votes
18
22
116
Solution #6:
Like Solution #1, but Remove 'Special Flags'
Use the checkbox-grid idea as in solution #1, but remove 'Set user ID', 'Set group ID', and 'Sticky'.
Use the checkbox-grid idea as in solution #1, but remove 'Set user ID', 'Set group ID', and 'Sticky'.
13
votes
33
43
20
Solution #7:
adding to solution #5
I am not to sure what the poster ment.
But to be able to edit users in each group when one brings up the properties window shown in solution #1
Maybe having an unlock button on the properties dialog box, like with network settings would be good.
This could solve the other issue some have of, I am the only user but have no access to my usb drive, cant change properties.
I am not to sure what the poster ment.
But to be able to edit users in each group when one brings up the properties window shown in solution #1
Maybe having an unlock button on the properties dialog box, like with network settings would be good.
This could solve the other issue some have of, I am the only user but have no access to my usb drive, cant change properties.
145
votes
193
23
48
Solution #8:
S1++: Add visual hints for logical grouping
Written by
lfaraone the 3 Apr 10 at 17:30.
Building off solution one, we should also add logical grouping, which will allow the user to follow associations between the preferences in the grid more easily.
Building off solution one, we should also add logical grouping, which will allow the user to follow associations between the preferences in the grid more easily.
<img src="http://img265.imageshack.us/img265/9108/newpermissions.png" />
40
votes
50
11
10
Solution #9:
S #1 + #3 + Advance Bottom
Written by
braiam the 8 Apr 10 at 06:45.
As in the Solution # 3, we can´t change user right of a file/folder if we are not root, this should change with a Bottom that read "Become root" and reload the box, Solution # 1 are usefully to know current access permitions and with Become Root butoom change it. Set SID and text migth be in a advanced section.
As in the Solution # 3, we can´t change user right of a file/folder if we are not root, this should change with a Bottom that read "Become root" and reload the box, Solution # 1 are usefully to know current access permitions and with Become Root butoom change it. Set SID and text migth be in a advanced section.
13
votes
23
13
10
Solution #10:
A merge of #1, #3,4,5 and #6
Written by
Tatsel the 12 Apr 10 at 06:53.
I agree, the default one confused me long time (and still does), so I am proposing the advanced view, the "Become Root" button, the "default permissions" button, for dual(or more)-booters, as example and the current Owner/Group.
About #6, I would rather put it under a button that open a small dialog (or anything similar) because:
1- This is more advanced features that new users should probably not mess with;
2- the permission dialog will be rather big even without those last options. We don't all have 32'', HD computer screens.
I agree, the default one confused me long time (and still does), so I am proposing the advanced view, the "Become Root" button, the "default permissions" button, for dual(or more)-booters, as example and the current Owner/Group.
About #6, I would rather put it under a button that open a small dialog (or anything similar) because:
1- This is more advanced features that new users should probably not mess with;
2- the permission dialog will be rather big even without those last options. We don't all have 32'', HD computer screens.
Can't See Links on Ubuntu Forums
Written by Penguin Guy the 29 Aug 09 at 18:04.
Related project: ubuntuforums.org .
Not an idea
When you create a link on the Ubuntu forums it appears the same color as normal text in the preview, this can cause confusion for the author. For example, you will see something like:
This is not a problem when viewing posts, only when previewing them.
Lots of Duplicated Syntax Files
Written by Penguin Guy the 31 Aug 09 at 11:50.
Global category: Programming.
New
Programs like GEdit, Nano, Vim and Firefox all have their own syntax files, this has three disadvantages: It wastes space, it wastes developers time, and they all color code differently.
Solution #1:
Add 'Edit with Program' Below 'Open with Program'
Possible Uses:
Images
o 'Open' - 'Photo Viewer'
o 'Edit' - 'Gimp'
Sound Files
o 'Open' - 'Rhythmbox'
o 'Edit' - 'Audacity'
HTML
o 'Open' - 'Firefox'
o 'Edit' - 'Bluefish'
---------------
In the 'Properties' -> 'Open With' menu you should add options to disable the Open or Edit buttons for certain files (most people read text files through a text editor so there would be no need for the 'Open' option on them). It would of course, be possible to assign an editor to the open button, but that's up to the user.
Possible Uses:
Images
o 'Open' - 'Photo Viewer'
o 'Edit' - 'Gimp'
Sound Files
o 'Open' - 'Rhythmbox'
o 'Edit' - 'Audacity'
HTML
o 'Open' - 'Firefox'
o 'Edit' - 'Bluefish'
---------------
In the 'Properties' -> 'Open With' menu you should add options to disable the Open or Edit buttons for certain files (most people read text files through a text editor so there would be no need for the 'Open' option on them). It would of course, be possible to assign an editor to the open button, but that's up to the user.
Solution #2:
Extend #1 to Include an 'Execute' Option
I find needing to chose between opening and executing a file *after* clicking it to be annoying. The context menu should have 3 options.
-Open/View
-Edit
-Execute
Of course, each option would only appear if the action were possible such as not having the execute option for a jpeg or any object without +x in the permissions.
Every file has 3 permission levels (rwx), why not have 3 ways of opening it via context-menu?
I find needing to chose between opening and executing a file *after* clicking it to be annoying. The context menu should have 3 options.
-Open/View
-Edit
-Execute
Of course, each option would only appear if the action were possible such as not having the execute option for a jpeg or any object without +x in the permissions.
Every file has 3 permission levels (rwx), why not have 3 ways of opening it via context-menu?
Solution #3:
Switch 'Open' and 'Edit' for More Descriptive Words
Possible uses:
Images
o 'View' - 'Photo Viewer'
o 'Edit' - 'Gimp'
Sound Files
o 'Play' - 'Rhythmbox'
o 'Edit' - 'Audacity'
Scripts
o 'Execute' - 'Sh'
o 'Edit' - 'Vim'
Archives
o 'Extract' - 'Archive Manager'
o 'Browse' - 'Archive Mounter'
---------------
Simply switch 'Open' and 'Edit' for more descriptive words (such as the above) if needed. Although this has no practical effect, it will certainly add to the depth of the user experience. Inspired by michele74.
Possible uses:
Images
o 'View' - 'Photo Viewer'
o 'Edit' - 'Gimp'
Sound Files
o 'Play' - 'Rhythmbox'
o 'Edit' - 'Audacity'
Scripts
o 'Execute' - 'Sh'
o 'Edit' - 'Vim'
Archives
o 'Extract' - 'Archive Manager'
o 'Browse' - 'Archive Mounter'
---------------
Simply switch 'Open' and 'Edit' for more descriptive words (such as the above) if needed. Although this has no practical effect, it will certainly add to the depth of the user experience. Inspired by michele74.
Solution #4:
Configurable 'Open With' Options
Written by
Wim the 24 Aug 09 at 15:06.
Why limit the user to predefined 'Open With' options? Allow the user to rename and add alternatives. It would probably be nice to have some reasonable defaults though (such as in
idea #3 ). For example:
Default HTML
o 'Open' - 'Firefox'
o 'Edit' - 'Bluefish'
User-Configured HTML
o 'Open' - 'Epiphany'
o 'Edit' - 'Emacs'
o '2Text' - 'html2text'
Why limit the user to predefined 'Open With' options? Allow the user to rename and add alternatives. It would probably be nice to have some reasonable defaults though (such as in idea #3). For example:
Default HTML
o 'Open' - 'Firefox'
o 'Edit' - 'Bluefish'
User-Configured HTML
o 'Open' - 'Epiphany'
o 'Edit' - 'Emacs'
o '2Text' - 'html2text'
Solution #5:
Extend #1 to no changes by default, and Allow to use Open/Edit for advanced user
Iy is great idea to have few applications to use for one type of the file. But It should be triggered by Advanced settings items. No changes by default.
Iy is great idea to have few applications to use for one type of the file. But It should be triggered by Advanced settings items. No changes by default.
Solution #9:
Define Default App Based on Last Choice
The default app for opening a file should change based on the last choice used to open the file from the context menu.
The default app for opening a file should change based on the last choice used to open the file from the context menu.
Torrent Download is Slow
Written by Penguin Guy the 13 May 09 at 19:39.
Related project: ubuntu.com .
Not an idea
When you try and download an Ubuntu torrent straight after the release it downloads extremely slowly which is obviously quite annoying.