Ubuntu QA:
BlogBrainstormPackage status
Log in
Ubuntu QA
The Ubuntu community has contributed 22700 ideas, 138270 comments, 2629576 votes
Idea sandbox Idea sandbox
Popular ideas Popular ideas
Ideas in development Ideas in development
Implemented ideas Implemented ideas

Contributor AndrewC

Build a Ubuntu/Hurd Live-CD  
Written by natureflow the 17 Mar 08 at 20:24. Global category: System. New
Please build an Ubuntu/Hurd Live-CD, so I can easily test GNU/Hurd. :-)
-30
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #4948
Written by natureflow the 17 Mar 08 at 20:24.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #4948 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

See the 3 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 31 Jul 09 at 19:09) >>

Provide The Latest Pidgin Package  
Written by goodsforyou the 4 Mar 08 at 05:24. Global category: Internet & Networking. Not an idea
The Pidgin package in ubuntu repository is outdated. Please provide the latest Pidgin package.
194
votes
closed
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #2988
Written by goodsforyou the 4 Mar 08 at 05:24.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #2988 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

See the 9 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 26 Jul 09 at 04:04) >>

Undo button in all Preferences windows/forms  
Written by rumli the 19 Mar 08 at 21:16. Global category: Accessibility. New
One of the first things I noticed when I moved from Windows to Ubuntu was that changes I made in any Preferences window took place immediately. In Windows, changes are deferred until the user presses the "Apply" button. As a new user, I always worried about accidentally making an unintended change, and not being able to undo a long sequence of experimental changes I made while playing around.

Providing an Undo button that undoes that last change on the form would greatly reduce anxiety for new users and would encourage experimentation, which will in turn lead to quickly achieving a level of comfort with Ubuntu.

I realize that this will require changing many apps, so I suggest providing an Undo framework that allows developers to quickly drop in an Undo button to forms. Or maybe even make the undos GNOME's responsibility instead of the app's responsibility.
112
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #5156
Written by rumli the 19 Mar 08 at 21:16.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #5156 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

See the 7 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 25 Jul 09 at 15:37) >>

Volume control should close when you click somewhere else  
Written by mtod1 the 14 Feb 09 at 23:38. Global category: Usability. Implemented
At the moment to close the volume control in the taskbar one has to left click on the speaker icon. This can be annoying as it is such a small icon.
890
votes
implemented
Selected solution (#1): Left click anywhere on the desktop to close taskbar volume control.
Written by mtod1 the 14 Feb 09 at 23:38.
I would suggest that left clicking anywhere on the desktop or making another window active by clicking should result in the volume control in the taskbar closing by default. Basically similar to how the Windows taskbar volume works.
360
votes
implemented
Selected solution (#2): Close volume control when it loses focus
Written by twocool the 21 Feb 09 at 12:59.
It would close with any click anywhere else.
-206
votes
implemented
Selected solution (#3): also automatic by inactive time
Written by yzarc the 22 Feb 09 at 16:13.
some seconds (5-10) after the last alteration in the volume popup control and it gets closed.
187
votes
implemented
Selected solution (#5): Do it also with the calendar !
Written by winerflo the 2 Mar 09 at 21:59.
everything is in the title
6
votes
implemented
Selected solution (#7): Have settings gui so user can set
Written by linuxrules the 12 Mar 09 at 23:11.
Have settings GUI, so user can set
auto-hide "on/off".
set auto-hide delay time.
close if lose focus "on/off",
show on mouse over "on/off".
stay open "on/off"
and maybe smartmode"on/off" (learns what user might want)
ect.
_____________________________________________________
and what "Long Lazuli wrote on the 28 Feb 09 at 00:14
=====================================================
I'd like an option to this behavior
to let the applet windows close itself or to make the panel or the window manager to close them
if we click somewhere else
else on timer."

i think this option should be on the 'gnome panel preferences menu'.

It is very usefull to leave some subpanel or applets open sometimes.
_________________________________________________________
if you think something else should be added to the list please comment

See the 22 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 30 Jun 09 at 17:07) >>

Give Each System a Rating  
Written by ducttape38 the 11 Mar 08 at 22:08. Global category: Others. New
Implement a simple rating system for all the hardware in a user's computer. This idea is somewhat like the "Vista Experience Index" with changes, such as the lowest score does not dictate the overall score. This would help users buy an Ubuntu system by looking at the rating. A certain score could also determine default settings such as if Compiz is enabled by default.
24
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #4298
Written by ducttape38 the 11 Mar 08 at 22:08.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #4298 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

See the 10 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 14 Jun 09 at 05:25) >>

Ubuntu Applications – Adopt Portable Applications Model  
Written by Marlo_nl the 15 Mar 08 at 17:06. Global category: Installation. New
A very interesting development for the Windows platform are the so-called Portable Applications.

These applications don't have to be installed using a “classic” Windows installer and their functioning does not depend on proper settings in the Windows Registry.
If fact they can be copied to an arbitrary location on (writable) storage media like a fixed or removable hard disk drive or an USB key and they will just work.

Portable Applications are not based on a new technology. In early MS-DOS days all applications were “portable”. A few reasons making this “old” technology so interesting are listed below:

1.If for some reason a user has to reinstall the OS then reinstalling the OS is just the start of a long and tedious process. All non-portable applications need to be reinstalled as well. This is, to say the least, very annoying.
For portable applications there is no need to do a reinstall. In worst case a user just needs to copy a backup of the portable applications back to the hard drive. And in case the user stored his portable applications in a different partition then there is even no need for this.

2.Portable applications can be stored on an arbitrary location on the hard disk or on removable media like an USB drive.
So even if the partition on which the OS resides gets short on disk space, the user can still add portable applications.
This is much more elegant than forcing the user to reorganize and reinstall his PC platform such that it can accommodate more applications.

3.Portable applications do not mix up or get integrated into the operating system.
In my opinion this is, at least for most software applications, a superior concept.

Currently the Ubuntu platform does not support the concept of portable applications.
When it comes to installing applications in general (portable or non-portable) then in my opinion Windows is superior over Ubuntu, or better said Linux in general.


[....]
-22
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #4737
Written by Marlo_nl the 15 Mar 08 at 17:06.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #4737 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!
4
votes
up equal down
Solution #2: Make a similar approach to Apple's way of managing applications
Written by wolterh the 28 Feb 09 at 18:06.
This method has nothing to do with instability. But now, to prevent the only odd--unnecessary duplication--this one-file applications should use the libs and resources they need from the system, like they actually do. This way, applications will be portable, and will only require the user to have the necessary dependencies installed.

Now, this applications, like in Apple, could be folders read differently by ubuntu, for example, folders that, instead of browsed, would run an executable inside them. The good side of this folder method is that the data can be used by other applications, with no need of decompression of anything of that sort.

Now, there is currently a group developing something really interesting: klik. This is very similar to aptitudes way of installing things, but the diferences are these:
1. You don't need root priviledges to install, for you are not touching system files (which is safer)
2. Applications are portable

But then, many of you may think that the "awesomeness" of the /usr/bin would be sacrificied, but no. The system will have a predetermined path to install applications, say /home/Applications, and that folder will be monitored for installed applications, like /usr/bin is. With autocomplete and everything, you would be able to launch applications from terminal by typing some letters and autocompleting with tab, just like you do now.

Besides, with this method the menu could be modified to autodetect applications installed there, and some classification added inside the application package/bundle could describe the type of application. Consequently, the applications will be classified in the menu automatically, without the need of modifying files and a lot of stuff that actually .deb packages need to do in order to prepare everything for you.

But this comfortability that would be now given if this system was applied would not only allow us to keep with more organization our applications, but will as well eliminate, vanish, liquidate the pain that many ubuntu users feel when they first log in and don't know where to get applications, where to find currently installed applications, etc.

So this is, in detail, what I propose.
Don't use click, but rather a new method.
Why? klik just wraps the files that would be copied into the system in one file, leaving the unecessary library duplication problem unresolved.
I propose, instead, something very similar, but official. Perhaps some structure like this one:

Application.app
-Contents
-launcher.bin
-icon.(png, jpg, svg, etc...)

This way, double clicking this .app suffixed folder will not browse it's contents, but it will instead run launcher.bin (which in this case will be the official name for the executable in every application bundle). Anyhow, the browse option will be still accessible by a context menu, like "Browse contents". And on top of all that, the icon will always be assigned and accessible for the application for it will be inside the bundle. Again, icon is, in this case, the standard name for the icon file inside the bundle.

See the 12 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 28 May 09 at 00:14) >>

Add 'Do not Update This' option to Update Manager  
Written by mridkash the 29 Mar 08 at 16:58. Global category: System. New
This issue is something I face regularly and thats why I'm posting it here.

I want a right click option on the updates in Update Manager which allows me to lock the version of a software and not update it. I know this functionality exists somewhere in Synaptic Package Manager, but still it would be convenient.

Example:
I have nvidia card on desktop and there was an intel video driver update recently, so it came up in Update Manager. I didn't want to install it obviously, so I unchecked it. But still every time I boot up, it shows new updates are available, and I see only that intel driver. If I get a 'do not update option' it would be handy.

Thanks
613
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #6016
Written by mridkash the 29 Mar 08 at 16:58.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #6016 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!
1
votes
up equal down
Solution #2: Simplify pinning on the command line
Written by cheesehead the 12 Apr 11 at 19:19.
Apt-pinning *is* complicated, and the admin is responsible for remembering which/when/why each package is pinned.

Once Apt can handle pins in more friendly fashion, and has the right hooks for the GUI to use, then Update Manager can add the desired functionality much more easily...and all other apt-based applications benefit too.

Give Apt the ability to track and remind the admin of pins in clear language. "Hey - I can't update Foo because you pinned LibFoo three months ago when you installed Bar."

Give Apt the ability to help users resolve confilcts (including pin-based) interactively. "Well, I can update Foo, but it might break Bar. Do you have an updated version of Bar handy to install?"

Improve the Apt API for pins: List pinned packages, list packages not installed because of a certain pin, etc.
2
votes
up equal down
Solution #3: Update mananger botons
Written by sboorbou the 13 Apr 11 at 17:47.
In the window updateMananger add a sign "+" in left of the package name, when you click in "+" open the package description and a checkbox with the "Never update"

It must also have a button at the top of the window UpdateMananger saying "Show hidden updates" or anything that shows the updates that were locked and the option to re-install them.

See the 13 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 6 May 09 at 04:30) >>

Drop-down terminal for gnome  
Written by terlmann the 3 Mar 08 at 22:04. Global category: Others. New
This is to be removed. I hope. The title is misleading.
10
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #2885
Written by terlmann the 3 Mar 08 at 22:04.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #2885 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

See the 5 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 20 Apr 09 at 20:43) >>

Try to develop a distributon-independent packaging format  
Written by _thomas_ the 5 Mar 08 at 19:50. Global category: System. New
I think it would be very good for Linux in general if there would exist a packaging format which nearly all distributions would support.
I do not mean every distribution should use deb or rpm, I mean a new packaging format which should be like a layer above rpm and deb and which should be able to integrate in many of the existing packaging systems. So for the user it should not be different to install like a deb file.
With this there would be an unified Linux package but the distributions can provide there own packages in their own packaging format too.
So then it would be much easier to develop programs for Linux.

I know Ubuntu cannot make this alone but Ubuntu can start and try to get all the distributions together for this.

I think the packaging problem is one of the greatest issues of Linux and should be fixed as soon as possible.
313
votes
up equal down
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #3398
Written by _thomas_ the 5 Mar 08 at 19:50.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #3398 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

See the 13 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 14 Apr 09 at 15:34) >>

Promote the use of gnome-main-menu (a.k.a. Slab) by default  
Written by ricardo the 28 Feb 08 at 20:16. Global category: Look and Feel. Won't implement
Slab is a replacement for the Applications-Places-System menu for the GNOME desktop. It puts all (the menus, options, applications, preferences and so) behind a unique button ("Computer"). OpenSUSE uses it by default, and I believe Fedora too.

There's a blueprint about that which was accepted for Feisty, but it was never be implemented.

To try it, install the gnome-main-menu package and add the applet in a GNOME panel.

An screenshot:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/fullo/187305594/sizes/o/
-213
votes
closed
Solution #1: Auto-generated solution of idea #191
Written by ricardo the 28 Feb 08 at 20:16.
Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #191 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

See the 21 comments or propose a solution (latest comment the 23 Mar 09 at 17:38) >>

<< Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... Next >>