<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Ubuntu brainstorm]]></title>
    <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Post your ideas and vote for the entries you like. Please read the posting <b><a href="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Brainstorm">guidelines</a></b> and <b><a href="http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/advanced_search">check</a></b> if your idea has been posted already! ]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>QAPoll module</generator>
 

    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[6551] Fix Suspend and Hibernate]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/94/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Suspend and hibernate still seems to be a big issue based on forum posts. Really focus on fixing it, even with proprietary drivers.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34043"> Bug #34043</a> : [Information on this bug will be retrieved soon]<br/>


<a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=579781"> Ubuntuforums.org thread #579781</a>
<br/>

]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/94/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[5261] Clean up Preferences and Administration.]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/80/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[First of all: What is the difference between Preferences and Administration? For example: why do I see 'Encryption and Keyrings' in Preferences and 'Keyring Manager' in Administration? What is the difference between 'Default Printer' and 'Printing'? Why do I have to disable the Tracker under Sessions and not under Search and Indexing? And why are these menu's so large? I have 24 items in Preferences (they don't even fit on my screen!) and 18 items in Administration. To put all this stuff in a popup menu is bad interface design imho. Besides, the number of option should be much smaller. A few suggestions:<br /><br />- Merge 'Screensaver', 'Screen Resolution' and 'Screens and Graphics'.<br />- Merge 'Network', 'Network Proxy' and 'Network Tools'.<br />- Merge 'Update Manager, Synaptic Package Manager, Software Sources'.<br />- Merge 'Encryption and Keyrings', 'Authorizations', 'Keyring Manager'.<br /><br /><br />Below are all settings I can visit via the System menu. This is just way too much.<br /><br /><br />-- Preferences --<br />Universal Access<br />About Me<br />Appearance<br />Bluetooth<br />Default Printer<br />Encryption and Keyrings<br />Keyboard<br />Keyboard Shortcuts<br />Main Menu<br />Mouse<br />Network Proxy<br />PalmOS Devices (I don't have one)<br />Power Management<br />Preferred Applications<br />Remote Desktop<br />Removable Drives and Media<br />SCIM Input Method Setup (What is this?)<br />Screen Resolution<br />Screensaver<br />Search and Index (Why can't I disable the tracker here?)<br />Sessions<br />Sound<br />System Settings <br />Windows<br /><br />-- Administration --<br />Authorizations (for what?)<br />Hardware Drivers<br />Keyring Manager (for what?)<br />Language Support<br />Login Window<br />Network<br />Network Tools<br />Printing<br />Screens and Graphics<br />Services<br />Shared Folders<br />Software Sources<br />Synaptic Package Manager (imagine a new user: wtf is Synaptic?)<br />System Log<br />System Monitor<br />Time and Date<br />Update Manager<br />Users and Groups<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174277"> Bug #174277</a> : [Information on this bug will be retrieved soon]<br/>

<a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/system-menu-cleanup"> Blueprint system-menu-cleanup:</a> [Information on this blueprint will be retrieved soon]<br/>

<a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=736475"> Ubuntuforums.org thread #736475</a>
<br/>

]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/80/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[5117] Speed Up Ubuntu-Gnome boot time]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/42/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I guess everybody has experienced the rather long boot up times in Ubuntu (particularly with laptops). I know they are already working on it, but the change from feisty to gutsy was a pain in the ass in terms of boot up speed.<br />A default WinXP installation beats Ubuntu's boot up time by far!! That shouldn't be allowed fellas!!<br /><br />I therefore propose to the development team (both Ubuntu and by extension Gnome)to work on the improvement of boot up times in Ubuntu systems.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />

<a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/jaunty-boot-performance"> Blueprint jaunty-boot-performance:</a> [Information on this blueprint will be retrieved soon]<br/>

<a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=585635"> Ubuntuforums.org thread #585635</a>
<br/>

]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/42/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[4592] Easy mounting of Images like ISO and CUE]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/194/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Hi!<br /><br />I'm a big fan of Images like .iso. <br />But it is not very easy to mount this Images. <br />I think there must be a Tool in Nautilus and Dolphin wich alows mounting Images with a double Click. (This feature exists int MacOS). Or with a right click on the file and then there must be a poit "Mount Image". I thick that would be a very use full Tool for every one. <br />A good example for this is CDemu. <br /><br />I know there are some ohter good programs, but I think that would be the easyest way and very confortible.<br /><br />Nanotron<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197317"> Bug #197317</a> : [Information on this bug will be retrieved soon]<br/>


<a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=87369"> Ubuntuforums.org thread #87369</a>
<br/>

]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/194/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[4471] Unmount resolution]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/72/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[When someone wants to unmount a volume and the mount point is used, he gets a message telling him that the volume can't be unmounted because an application uses it. The user has no idea which application is actually using it and can't remove the device.<br /><br />I propose that the popup tells him which application(s) is(are) using the device and propose to terminate them (that list should be kept up to date when the app. dies).<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/81239"> Bug #81239</a> : [Information on this bug will be retrieved soon]<br/>



]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/72/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[4094] Start taking advantage of Upstart]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/35/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Replace initscripts with upstart events. Our boot sequence is currently slow, full of race conditions and poor interactions, especially with competition between the series of tasks run by sysv-rc, udev and sometimes just with the kernel. We developed upstart so that we could have a truly event driven boot sequence that would be fast, reliable and flexible; we should take advantage of it.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />

<a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/replacement-initscripts"> Blueprint replacement-initscripts:</a> [Information on this blueprint will be retrieved soon]<br/>


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/35/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[3832] Create a better hardware database]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/40/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[People around the globe that are using/concidering using Ubuntu are afraid that some of their hardware won't work for them. And some are frustrated to buy additional add-on cards to work around unsupportad onboard chips. All this could be avoided with a lookup in an ubuntu Hardware Database Website.<br /><br />Some problematic hardware can be used with more or less work if helping information is available together with the hardware compatabillity data.<br /><br />The hardware database can be found at http://hwdb.ubuntu.com/<br /><br />From idea #47: The data should then be available in a format that is simple for users to browse on-line when considering new hardware.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3382"> Bug #3382</a> : [Information on this bug will be retrieved soon]<br/>

<a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/better-hardware-database"> Blueprint better-hardware-database:</a> [Information on this blueprint will be retrieved soon]<br/>


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/40/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[3523] Ubuntu should recognize hardware changes]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/157/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[When i change some hardware pieces i need to configure them manually, ubuntu should recognize there has been a hardware change and configure it.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/157/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[2671] LiveUSB]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/16/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[cdroms are slow, don't allow to modify their content easily, they are weak and not as easy to carry as USB keys.<br /><br />It would be great to provide Ubuntu as a liveUSB just as Mandriva does. We should be able to carry our distribution on any computer, manage our preferred settings (do I want binary drivers enabled ? what is my preferred resolution ?), etc.<br /><br />The thing is not to make something transportable, but really a nomad system that could be used just the best way as it could on any computer.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/16/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[2406] Easy way of backing up/moving your documents and settings]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/1/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[At the moment, if someone wants to backup his documents or prepare a migration from a computer to another there isn't much more than file-roller to create a backup.<br />Ideally, the user should be able to run a graphic software which would ask what the user wants to backup and where (tape/usb key/remote). <br />Then the same tool would be able to restore the backup.<br /><br />It would be useful for both backups and migration from a computer to another.<br /><br />Update : See duplicates ideas which contain even more great ideas about that idea.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/1/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[2268] Mouse Button Extension]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/120/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Ubuntu should take full advantage of all available mouse buttons.<br />Integrate this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/146160<br /><br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146160"> Bug #146160</a> : [Information on this bug will be retrieved soon]<br/>


<a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=455656"> Ubuntuforums.org thread #455656</a>
<br/>

]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/120/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[2113] Warning about low disk space]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/57/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Provide this warning with possibility to solve the problem.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />

<a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/warning-of-disk-being-full"> Blueprint warning-of-disk-being-full:</a> [Information on this blueprint will be retrieved soon]<br/>

<a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=409822"> Ubuntuforums.org thread #409822</a>
<br/>

]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/57/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[2103] Include a graphical frontend to edit /boot/grub/menu.lst installed by default]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/141/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Right now, the most likely successful migrations to Ubuntu happen for *nix experts and total novices who have someone install Ubuntu for them, but the most likely people to try Ubuntu are Windows power users--those who like a lot of configuration options but who are also used to using the GUI for tweaking options and not manually editing a text configuration file.<br /><br />The most popular requests for editing the /boot/grub/menu.lst file involve changing the default boot option (to Windows instead of Ubuntu) and changing the timeout before a boot option is selected. The other less popular ones would be just bonus features, I guess.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />

<a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/graphical-grub-config"> Blueprint graphical-grub-config:</a> [Information on this blueprint will be retrieved soon]<br/>

<a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=409835"> Ubuntuforums.org thread #409835</a>
<br/>

]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/141/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1885] Better bluetooth support]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/95/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Bluetooth support is still a mixed bag in ubuntu. Ubuntu needs to do a better job of making sure bluetooth devices work with the operating system. Headsets are still an arcane science and Nautilus still can't browse a BT device.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />


<a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=594624"> Ubuntuforums.org thread #594624</a>
<br/>

]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/95/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1818] Make ubuntu more responsive]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/85/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[I've 2 distros installed on my laptop: Ubuntu Gutsy and Arch Linux! The feel with arch is that it's whippy. From the other side ubuntu is sluggish. Sure I know that my system is not so up to date (a 1.5 Ghz centrino 512 M Ram) but Arch work very well on it with the same services loaded as in ubuntu.<br /><br />So I think Ubuntu can do something to improve performance.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />



No attachments.
]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/85/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1581] More hardware info in system monitor]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/3822/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[It would be nice if include by adding a new tab for it.: <br />- temperature (cpu, hdd, chipsets),<br />- memory (with manufacture model?)<br />- graphics card (model, memory)<br />- chipsets (processor, cores, lan, wifi)<br />-  ... others?<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />

<a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/about-this-computer"> Blueprint about-this-computer:</a> [Information on this blueprint will be retrieved soon]<br/>


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/3822/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1555] Improve add/remove programs]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/103/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Expansion of Add Remove Programs - show user-provided descriptions, feature lists, screenshots, comments, ratings, integration with launchpad. Initial page should be top-rated apps, or newest apps. Managed by a webapp?<br /><br />Or... leave it as it is, but create a website displaying all the great software available for ubuntu including all the features mentioned above with apturl links to install. <br /><br />From #4613 (merged):<br /><br />It should be indicated how much I'll have to download to install something.<br /><br />We have download limits here and well... quite often I exceed them. It would be useful to indicate how big the download is going to be.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/157570"> Bug #157570</a> : [Information on this bug will be retrieved soon]<br/>

<a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/add-remove-software-improvements"> Blueprint add-remove-software-improvements:</a> [Information on this blueprint will be retrieved soon]<br/>


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/103/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1535] Integrate prefetch into Ubuntu]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/31/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In todays computer systems the main bottleneck is not CPU but disk access which is several orders of magnitude slower than CPU and memory. In such circumstances the way to improve application performance is to prefetch data it needs from disk before it even requests it and it is the point of prefetching techniques. This speeds up boot and decreases the time needed to start programs. This replaces and it is faster than the currently used readahead.<br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />

<a href="https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/prefetch"> Blueprint prefetch:</a> [Information on this blueprint will be retrieved soon]<br/>


]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/31/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1505] Fix Hard Drive Load Cycle Problem in Laptops]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/288/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Advanced power management currently cycles the hard drive once every few seconds even during activity on most laptops.  This severely shortens the life of hard drives. <br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59695"> Bug #59695</a> : [Information on this bug will be retrieved soon]<br/>


<a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=591503"> Ubuntuforums.org thread #591503</a>
<br/>

]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/288/</guid>
    </item>


    <item>
      <title><![CDATA[[1489] Update NTFS support]]></title>
      <link>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/1278/</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Ubuntu uses a known bad NTFS-3g driver in it's repositories. <br />Please keep Ubuntu up to date, since this might (and does) cause data loss, especially on mobile, NTFS formatted hard drives.<br /><br />Here's a link to ntfs-3g forum thread that verifies this<br />http://forum.ntfs-3g.org/viewtopic.php?t=797<br /><br />
<br />
<b>Attachments</b>:
<br />
<a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250705"> Bug #250705</a> : [Information on this bug will be retrieved soon]<br/>



]]>
</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06-Jan-2009 00:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
      <guid>http://brainstorm.ubuntu.com/item/1278/</guid>
    </item>


  </channel>
</rss>

