It would be great if users could attach money to Brainstorm ideas. Its all good and well to post hundreds of ideas, but as things go, ideas which are posted first may not be the best ideas, but will climb to the top fastest (and will stay there, because people will vote for them on most popular).
Lets make it possible for people to donate $5 or so to their own ideas. Sure nobody may implement it, or the patch may not be accepted but it opens things up a lot more. Nobody loses either.
For those who think that this will turn linux coders into people who only code for money are wrong. There have been many bounties in the past, and they have not wiped out the many developers (me inclusive) who code as a hobby. Even with the gnome bounties in place, I still continued coding my application at the time for instance.
Anyway, at the end of the day, its not hard to implement, and it will do nothing but speed up development for highly wanted features (and maybe even organisations like gnome could use the money on spreading word about linux, or improving their hardware support).
Written by YSH the 15 Mar 08 at 16:06.
Implemented
Many ideas on brainstorm are just bugs, and brainstorm is not for bugs, its for ideas. If you got a bug, go to launchpad. Obviously not everyone new to ubuntu knows that, so they post it here as an idea. There should be some warning, most likely when you're submitting a new idea, that that's the way it is.
I vote many ideas up, because they are just good. But few ideas are really in my wishlist which I love to see them in Ubuntu ASAP. Let me mark them!
For example each user might have 5 "star"s by which one can mark one's most important (with most priority) ideas.
This will give us an idea of priority of ideas as seen by users.
Written by Cybercod the 13 Mar 08 at 05:01.
Won't implement
As well as have a category on the side panel where you can see ideas that are about to die.
This will give unpopular ideas a last chance to be seen before being removed altogether.
Putting the number at -10 makes it so that a slightly negative number won't hurt it and it has a chance to come back.
When ideas are at -7 they should be put on the "about to die" list and people can either save them from dying or push them on over the edge.
This is a great way for the community to get rid of spam posts too.
Ideas that are already below -10 at time of implementation should be artificially bumped up to -7 so they get a fair shake before taking the plunge into deletion.
Some ideas might be able to make better impressions if they are written better. Deleting them will free up others to re-submit the idea without being discouraged by a similar but poorly written post.
Dead ideas should be visible to the original poster, but invisible to others.
All of us probably support many ideas emerging here. Let's say there are 3 ideas that got 100 votes from 100 voters. How can we know which is the most important. And the second and the third. Every body voted to each one, because all the ideas were important but everybody has already had the rank of the ideas in his mind. Let us know that preference!
so we can improve voting by rating: 0-5.
By this score = average rate * votes
So you will know whats the most important.
Other advantage:
-Now the rank of ideas many times reflects only the age of an idea, instead of its goodness. You can judge them better on basis of the average rate.
-We could also put interesting questions like:
-Which is the best game? there are many popular and each one would get (and deserve) a score from everybody. But we wouldnt know which one is the best by the present voting system.