Written by varunjo the 27 Nov 09 at 07:13.

Just download the file, click on it , enter your password , Then it will ask you whether you want to install the software the repository contains.So simple.

Just download the file, click on it , enter your password , Then it will ask you whether you want to install the software the repository contains.So simple.

Written by Stebalien the 27 Nov 09 at 21:30.

Modify apt-url to support ppa links.
Ex:
normal apturl: apt:firefox
ppa apturl: ppa:user/ppa?install=firefox

Modify apt-url to support ppa links. Ex: normal apturl: apt:firefox ppa apturl: ppa:user/ppa?install=firefox

Written by yman the 30 Nov 09 at 02:38.

For example:
apt:w32codecs@packages.medibuntu.org

or something like that. If the repository isn't already included in sources.list, display a warning about installing software from untrusted sources.

EDIT:
Create a standard way for repositories to store their key, so it can be automatically retrieved when doing the above.

For example: apt:w32codecs@packages.medibuntu.org or something like that. If the repository isn't already included in sources.list, display a warning about installing software from untrusted sources. EDIT: Create a standard way for repositories to store their key, so it can be automatically retrieved when doing the above.

Written by snadrus the 1 Dec 09 at 22:11.

When installing google chrome, it adds the Google Labs repo to my system. This keeps things simple and is completely unnoticed except to experienced users. That way people can share DEBs (including out of date DEBs) and they will install fine & be updated later.

When installing google chrome, it adds the Google Labs repo to my system. This keeps things simple and is completely unnoticed except to experienced users. That way people can share DEBs (including out of date DEBs) and they will install fine & be updated later.

Written by mdhunn the 2 Dec 09 at 21:38.

I really like the idea of including the repo in the deb but security is a concern. being able to check keys against a certificate revocation list in launchpad and un-install software from a source would help. I know this would be a pain to implement but a centralized key and certificate server would help keep us from winding up like Windoze.

I really like the idea of including the repo in the deb but security is a concern. being able to check keys against a certificate revocation list in launchpad and un-install software from a source would help. I know this would be a pain to implement but a centralized key and certificate server would help keep us from winding up like Windoze.

Written by wolterh the 17 Dec 09 at 16:28.

This solution is pretty much the same as Solution #1, but with a small variation.

A button should be placed in the site to install the package, another to download. If one clicks the download button, solution #1 pretty much describes what should happen. If one clicks on the install button, this is what will happen:
1. User gets prompted for password (gksu style)
2. EULA-style dialog appears asking the user if he/she approves the provider's gpg key.
3. GUI opens up (maybe Ubuntu Software Center*) downloading the package for later installation. The package is downloaded where packages are usually downloaded when one installs via [apt-get install].

---
*If Ubuntu Software Center is used, then there must be an indication that the package is not in the official repository (universe or whatever). Maybe the tabs could be re-arranged, in the following way:
-Official Repository
-Third-Party Repositories
---------------------
-Installed Software

This solution is pretty much the same as Solution #1, but with a small variation. A button should be placed in the site to install the package, another to download. If one clicks the download button, solution #1 pretty much describes what should happen. If one clicks on the install button, this is what will happen: 1. User gets prompted for password (gksu style) 2. EULA-style dialog appears asking the user if he/she approves the provider's gpg key. 3. GUI opens up (maybe Ubuntu Software Center*) downloading the package for later installation. The package is downloaded where packages are usually downloaded when one installs via [apt-get install]. --- *If Ubuntu Software Center is used, then there must be an indication that the package is not in the official repository (universe or whatever). Maybe the tabs could be re-arranged, in the following way: -Official Repository -Third-Party Repositories --------------------- -Installed Software

Written by Ssdg the 2 Jan 10 at 15:12.

Relying on a 3rd party repository means relying on it's manager for the very stability and safety of your system. because package installation allows full access to the core of your system (kernel, network, filesystems, MBR,...) and to replace already installed packages (including libraries. I might be a good thing, or not.)

Everytime a new repository is set, you allow a new organisation/person to gain this access.

Those facts should be stated to the user in order for him to take the right decision.

Relying on a 3rd party repository means relying on it's manager for the very stability and safety of your system. because package installation allows full access to the core of your system (kernel, network, filesystems, MBR,...) and to replace already installed packages (including libraries. I might be a good thing, or not.) Everytime a new repository is set, you allow a new organisation/person to gain this access. Those facts should be stated to the user in order for him to take the right decision.

Written by TwistedLincoln the 5 Jan 10 at 19:34.

It's already possible for 3rd party vendors to create .deb files that add their repo info and GPG key. We should just encourage this rather than design a new system.

It's already possible for 3rd party vendors to create .deb files that add their repo info and GPG key. We should just encourage this rather than design a new system.

Written by Clorox the 9 Jan 10 at 05:50.

Currently, the feature is there, but the developers don't want to enable it because of security reasons. If it were enabled, then repositories could be added easily "with one click".

Currently, the feature is there, but the developers don't want to enable it because of security reasons. If it were enabled, then repositories could be added easily "with one click".

Written by undecim the 11 Jan 10 at 03:44.

In addition to solution #1, the user should have the option of installing only selected package(s) from a repository.

This allows the user to install an application without providing the maintainer continued access to the user's system, and also keeps the user safe should the repository become compromised later.

This also allows a package to be installed if a repository causes a dependency paradox, but the desired package(s) do not.

In addition to solution #1, the user should have the option of installing only selected package(s) from a repository. This allows the user to install an application without providing the maintainer continued access to the user's system, and also keeps the user safe should the repository become compromised later. This also allows a package to be installed if a repository causes a dependency paradox, but the desired package(s) do not.

Written by makru the 18 May 09 at 00:28.

Now, it is pretty evident that most computer users have no idea what "open source" or "restricted software" refers to. After all, Windows and OS X do not give you warnings when installing open source software. Thus, this impediment for new users should be removed. It serves absolutely no purpose aside from confusing them. Linux veterans know what is proprietary and what is not, because that is their passion. New users could not care less and just want to install whatever they desire. Of course this same mentality should be carried across add/remove installations and video codecs. After all, nobody cares that Totem needs to install new codecs to play a movie, so it should happen automatically without any user input. If open source advocates dislike propriety features, they should be able to disable this feature through the software sources section. Also, I realize that ubuntu restricted extras resolves most of these problems, but would that be the first thing you would search for when introduced to a new operating system? No. That is why a video player like VLC (that just works) has more downloads than the entire Ubuntu user base.

Now, it is pretty evident that most computer users have no idea what "open source" or "restricted software" refers to. After all, Windows and OS X do not give you warnings when installing open source software. Thus, this impediment for new users should be removed. It serves absolutely no purpose aside from confusing them. Linux veterans know what is proprietary and what is not, because that is their passion. New users could not care less and just want to install whatever they desire. Of course this same mentality should be carried across add/remove installations and video codecs. After all, nobody cares that Totem needs to install new codecs to play a movie, so it should happen automatically without any user input. If open source advocates dislike propriety features, they should be able to disable this feature through the software sources section. Also, I realize that ubuntu restricted extras resolves most of these problems, but would that be the first thing you would search for when introduced to a new operating system? No. That is why a video player like VLC (that just works) has more downloads than the entire Ubuntu user base.

Written by tuxxy the 18 May 09 at 14:36.

The warning may benefit from being renamed to a less technical orientated recommendation. This new warning should allow even the newest Ubuntu users to gain an understanding as to what this process will do and how it will benefit their new installation.

Examples could be "Is it OK to install the Recommended / Appropriate / Multimedia / third-party software for your system"

The warning may benefit from being renamed to a less technical orientated recommendation. This new warning should allow even the newest Ubuntu users to gain an understanding as to what this process will do and how it will benefit their new installation. Examples could be "Is it OK to install the Recommended / Appropriate / Multimedia / third-party software for your system"

Written by Glich the 18 May 09 at 17:42.

The same as solution 2 but a check box should exist to disable future warnings. The option should also exist somewhere to re-enable warnings.

The same as solution 2 but a check box should exist to disable future warnings. The option should also exist somewhere to re-enable warnings.

Written by Psycho_zs the 19 May 09 at 04:49.

Description in the warning, as short as possible:
1. what it is,
2. why it is sometimes necessary,
3. but why it is better to stay away from it.

and links on further reading of course.

Proper education is the key.

Description in the warning, as short as possible: 1. what it is, 2. why it is sometimes necessary, 3. but why it is better to stay away from it. and links on further reading of course. Proper education is the key.

Written by Lachu the 19 May 09 at 06:56.

Rename restricted software to stricted licensing software. Add warning this is a third party software and Ubuntu team don't give quarantine it's should worked.

Rename restricted software to stricted licensing software. Add warning this is a third party software and Ubuntu team don't give quarantine it's should worked.

Written by Dim the 19 May 09 at 10:59.

Alerts always stand in the way. The problem is not only with the text of warning but with the alert itself.

What I propose is to move the warning text (improved according to solutions above) from the alert to the description of the application. Of course, the text should not be merged with the description and should look different.

Why is this better:
1. Nothing stands in the way.
2. When you have "restricted software" enabled, you still know which app is "restricted",

Alerts always stand in the way. The problem is not only with the text of warning but with the alert itself. What I propose is to move the warning text (improved according to solutions above) from the alert to the description of the application. Of course, the text should not be merged with the description and should look different. Why is this better: 1. Nothing stands in the way. 2. When you have "restricted software" enabled, you still know which app is "restricted",

Written by OpenNingia the 20 May 09 at 09:52.

Common users are scared of "Warning" icons (those with the yellow triangle ), so they rather click 'Cancel' or go in panic :D

Why don't we just replace the Warning message with an Information message ( or Question message ) with the more friendly ( I ) icon?

( Tango theme has a light bulb )

Here a mockup:

Common users are scared of "Warning" icons (those with the yellow triangle ), so they rather click 'Cancel' or go in panic :D Why don't we just replace the Warning message with an Information message ( or Question message ) with the more friendly ( I ) icon? ( Tango theme has a light bulb ) Here a mockup: <a href="http://img199.imageshack.us/my.php?image=mockuprestrict.png" target="_blank"><img src="http://img199.imageshack.us/img199/526/mockuprestrict.th.png" border="0" alt="Free Image Hosting at www.ImageShack.us" />

Written by natetechboy128 the 13 Jun 09 at 06:05.

"The package foo is non-free software. There are restrictions on the use of this package, which can be found here. "

"The package foo may be illegal in some countries; please check relevant laws before installation."

"The package foo is non-free software. There are restrictions on the use of this package, which can be found <a href="http://crunchsoft.com/foo/licensing.html"> here. </a>" "The package foo may be illegal in some countries; please check relevant laws before installation."

Written by Felitaur the 20 Mar 11 at 00:59.

There is much difference, some software is free itself, but restricted by wrong laws and some software is restricting users. Ubuntu should not display any warning if it is know, such software is legal withing country user selected on the system settings, but is should display such warning about software restricting user rights, also, dialog windows should describe what is wrong with such software.
Also, there should be options to install or deny software from both categories without further questions.

There is much difference, some software is free itself, but restricted by wrong laws and some software is restricting users. Ubuntu should not display any warning if it is know, such software is legal withing country user selected on the system settings, but is should display such warning about software restricting user rights, also, dialog windows should describe what is wrong with such software. Also, there should be options to install or deny software from both categories without further questions.

Written by orlox the 8 Sep 09 at 13:19.

The old name, AppCenter, seemed to be widely accepted. It's a short, yet informative name, that expresses the idea of the application in a very good way (a frontend that integrates all other software management frontends in a consistent way)

Perhaps this name should be restored, leave the package and executable named as appcenter, and list it in the administration menu as "Application Center" or "Ubuntu Application Center".

The old name, AppCenter, seemed to be widely accepted. It's a short, yet informative name, that expresses the idea of the application in a very good way (a frontend that integrates all other software management frontends in a consistent way) Perhaps this name should be restored, leave the package and executable named as appcenter, and list it in the administration menu as "Application Center" or "Ubuntu Application Center".

Written by orlox the 9 Sep 09 at 02:54.

An "app" is not something widely recognized, so it might be better to choose a name for this application that uses the word "software", but not the name store. Besides, this interface will serve to install many things that qualify as software, but not as an application (like codecs and fonts).

Pehaps, a contraction of the word like "soft" or "sw" could also be used for the application name (i.e. package name, executable, launchpad entry, etc...), while menu entries describe it using the whole word to keep clarity for unexperienced users.

Even more, the word software is correctly recognized by many non-english speakers, including some that are relatively computer-illiterate.

Since there's an infinite amount of alternative names that can be used here, perhaps this solution can be kept open to various alternatives (for now).

An "app" is not something widely recognized, so it might be better to choose a name for this application that uses the word "software", but not the name store. Besides, this interface will serve to install many things that qualify as software, but not as an application (like codecs and fonts). Pehaps, a contraction of the word like "soft" or "sw" could also be used for the application name (i.e. package name, executable, launchpad entry, etc...), while menu entries describe it using the whole word to keep clarity for unexperienced users. Even more, the word software is correctly recognized by many non-english speakers, including some that are relatively computer-illiterate. Since there's an infinite amount of alternative names that can be used here, perhaps this solution can be kept open to various alternatives (for now).

Written by orlox the 9 Sep 09 at 23:40.

This name would cover the technical aspect of using "software" over "application", and also take the advantage of the unifying concept of "center".

This solution complies with solution #3 as a particular case of it.

This name would cover the technical aspect of using "software" over "application", and also take the advantage of the unifying concept of "center". This solution complies with solution #3 as a particular case of it.

Written by Gaz Davidson the 10 Sep 09 at 12:58.

It adds and removes software, it will be in the menu next to all the applications.
Having an internal name is fine but there's no reason for it to have a fancy marketing name for users to see, simply call it what it does.

It adds and removes software, it will be in the menu next to all the applications. Having an internal name is fine but there's no reason for it to have a fancy marketing name for users to see, simply call it what it does.

Written by CVL the 12 Sep 09 at 07:21.

This idea is really a waste of time for everyone.

Software Store sounds great and I hope it would atract interest from lots of commercial developers to Ubuntu.

This idea is really a waste of time for everyone. Software Store sounds great and I hope it would atract interest from lots of commercial developers to Ubuntu.

Written by horusofoz the 13 Sep 09 at 10:15.

As the plan is to incorporate Add/Remove, Synaptic, Update Manager and other bits, I think Ubuntu Central or something similar (in concept not sound) that has a broader sense than software/app store/center would be more suitable.

Alternatively, Taking into consideration Ubuntu's humanistic feel I think it would be fitting if they gave the application a name in that vein. Ubuntu Nexus?

As the plan is to incorporate Add/Remove, Synaptic, Update Manager and other bits, I think Ubuntu Central or something similar (in concept not sound) that has a broader sense than software/app store/center would be more suitable. Alternatively, Taking into consideration Ubuntu's humanistic feel I think it would be fitting if they gave the application a name in that vein. Ubuntu Nexus?

Written by kazuya00 the 14 Sep 09 at 12:51.

UbuntuStore wesh a

UbuntuStore wesh a

Written by happy-word the 14 Sep 09 at 15:41.

Ubuntu AppCenter. I think this sound great...

Ubuntu AppCenter. I think this sound great...

Written by rrnwexec the 14 Sep 09 at 16:53.

"Market" is a friendlier and potential less commercial term than Store. Think of a farmer's market, or a community market, or a flea market as examples that exist in the real world and have a spirit of exchange, with or without commerce.

"Market" is a friendlier and potential less commercial term than Store. Think of a farmer's market, or a community market, or a flea market as examples that exist in the real world and have a spirit of exchange, with or without commerce.

Written by mfeliz the 14 Sep 09 at 18:35.

It Sounds good!

It Sounds good!

Written by daas88 the 14 Sep 09 at 20:34.

Because the word "manager" has a wider meaning than store, and it will have more uses than just installing software.

Because the word "manager" has a wider meaning than store, and it will have more uses than just installing software.

Written by Riky the 16 Sep 09 at 06:50.

I think Software Basket or Application Basket sound good, it can be recognized straight away.

I think Software Basket or Application Basket sound good, it can be recognized straight away.

Written by insanelyapple the 17 Sep 09 at 09:58.

I think its simple and intuitive.

I think its simple and intuitive.

Written by Sashin the 17 Sep 09 at 11:45.

I like this name 'cause it implies its the place to install anything, fonts, updates, applications and the lot.

The word central should be easier to translate that centre/center.

And the absence of the word store takes away the potentially commercial element of it.

Most importantly, it looks and sounds cool.

I like this name 'cause it implies its the place to install anything, fonts, updates, applications and the lot. The word central should be easier to translate that centre/center. And the absence of the word store takes away the potentially commercial element of it. Most importantly, it looks and sounds cool.

Written by Robin Nixon the 17 Sep 09 at 16:28.

This resolves the UK/US spelling issues of the word Center.

This resolves the UK/US spelling issues of the word Center.

Written by baldurpet the 17 Sep 09 at 20:01.

I didn't know whether I should add to the already long list of suggestions, but I wanted to approach this from a 'tad' different perspective.

I'm trying to think of a name that people can use with a sense of endearment like most of Apple's products. "Software Box" was the best thing I could come up with (as in "I need some software for X and Y"- "just look in the box").

I don't expect users to choose my idea for a name but I still want contributors to stop thinking about words that sound mechanical, dead and literal ("Software Center") and think about something more colloquial and friendly instead. Could you imagine your dad or mom saying it?

I didn't know whether I should add to the already long list of suggestions, but I wanted to approach this from a 'tad' different perspective. I'm trying to think of a name that people can use with a sense of endearment like most of Apple's products. "Software Box" was the best thing I could come up with (as in "I need some software for X and Y"- "just look in the box"). I don't expect users to choose my idea for a name but I still want contributors to stop thinking about words that sound mechanical, dead and literal ("Software Center") and think about something more colloquial and friendly instead. Could you imagine your dad or mom saying it?

Written by litokraz the 18 Sep 09 at 14:55.

In my opinion this name would simply connect the name of the operating system to what it really is: a depo of software. UbuDepo is a inuque name which can also be easily understood and pronounced almost anywhere in the world.

In my opinion this name would simply connect the name of the operating system to what it really is: a depo of software. UbuDepo is a inuque name which can also be easily understood and pronounced almost anywhere in the world.

Written by Vampireboi the 18 Sep 09 at 21:55.

Just call it this!! it makes sense because this is what every piece of software calls to and this is where you will go when you need something! i really like it! :)

Just call it this!! it makes sense because this is what every piece of software calls to and this is where you will go when you need something! i really like it! :)

Written by adamarmistead the 18 Sep 09 at 22:58.

This keeps the term software people seem to prefer and the "friendly" market term while expressing that the software available is free and open source.

This keeps the term software people seem to prefer and the "friendly" market term while expressing that the software available is free and open source.

Written by wolterh the 19 Sep 09 at 19:37.

I think the solution title says it all.

I like the Software Depot because it reminds me of Starcraft's Supply Depots. They always intrigued me.

Anyway, my other proposal is to call it Software Warehouse, but I understand that it may be highly criticized for phonetically it sounds repetitive as of softWARE WAREhouse, but that could be solved by changing Warehouse for Storehouse. Storehouse because it embeds the concept of storage (which is from where store comes from) but it gets rid of the commercial idea. Storehouse makes us think about a Warehouse, without having the phonetic problem described above.

I think the solution title says it all. I like the Software Depot because it reminds me of Starcraft's Supply Depots. They always intrigued me. Anyway, my other proposal is to call it Software Warehouse, but I understand that it may be highly criticized for phonetically it sounds repetitive as of softWARE WAREhouse, but that could be solved by changing Warehouse for Storehouse. Storehouse because it embeds the concept of storage (which is from where store comes from) but it gets rid of the commercial idea. Storehouse makes us think about a Warehouse, without having the phonetic problem described above.

Written by slashdotaccount the 20 Sep 09 at 17:42.

A compromise.

A compromise.

Written by kyrandesa the 21 Sep 09 at 07:49.

isn't that what it basically is doing?

isn't that what it basically is doing?

Written by rutvikgohil the 22 Sep 09 at 10:13.

in my opinion this may be quite simple name
because many new user like me finding bit difficult to get the name of this things
so if any 1 can suggest a simple name than is ll be a great thing..
thanks

and about last name "Ubu soft-pot"
it may mean like "container/vessel containing free software"
pot=jug,box,container,vessel in african

in my opinion this may be quite simple name because many new user like me finding bit difficult to get the name of this things so if any 1 can suggest a simple name than is ll be a great thing.. thanks and about last name "Ubu soft-pot" it may mean like "container/vessel containing free software" pot=jug,box,container,vessel in african

Written by mahajanudit the 23 Sep 09 at 19:00.

Bin is synonymous to warehouse, which means a storage place without implicitly implying commercialism.
But I think it's better than warehouse, cz somehow the name 'warehouse' just doesn't go...

Bin is synonymous to warehouse, which means a storage place without implicitly implying commercialism. But I think it's better than warehouse, cz somehow the name 'warehouse' just doesn't go...

Written by gaara87 the 25 Sep 09 at 16:14.

Ubuntu's heart is the kernel, but the softwares and applications are responsible for making the difference between two personalised Ubuntus. Much like saying, what differentiates you from me is the way we think!

Ubuntu:Humanism is a free form of thinking where its inception lies in the difference in thinking, hence the EpiCentre of Ubuntu,much like the Mind being the EpiCentre of a Human!:-)

Ubuntu's heart is the kernel, but the softwares and applications are responsible for making the difference between two personalised Ubuntus. Much like saying, what differentiates you from me is the way we think! Ubuntu:Humanism is a free form of thinking where its inception lies in the difference in thinking, hence the EpiCentre of Ubuntu,much like the Mind being the EpiCentre of a Human!:-)

Written by Frederic.Hardy the 26 Sep 09 at 00:38.

like think tank

like think tank

Written by anystupidname the 26 Sep 09 at 02:45.

app treasury
software vault
app nest
software bank
app locker
software armory
app depot
software dump
app hopper
software supply
app stockpile
software barn
app arsenal
software conservatory
app boutique
software emporium
app safe
software mine
app stash
software silo

app treasury software vault app nest software bank app locker software armory app depot software dump app hopper software supply app stockpile software barn app arsenal software conservatory app boutique software emporium app safe software mine app stash software silo

Written by gnarlin the 26 Nov 09 at 14:01.

When people search in the software center for their familiar proprietary software make the results point to comparable Free software while making it very clear that it is not the same program, just that it does the same job. This will help newcomers to Ubuntu quickly find the alternatives they are looking for.

For example. Jane does a search for Photoshop. The results show Gimp with a short highlighted text that explains that Gimp is a different program but that it will do the same job.

When people search in the software center for their familiar proprietary software make the results point to comparable Free software while making it very clear that it is not the same program, just that it does the same job. This will help newcomers to Ubuntu quickly find the alternatives they are looking for. For example. Jane does a search for Photoshop. The results show Gimp with a short highlighted text that explains that Gimp is a different program but that it will do the same job.

Written by doobiest the 26 Nov 09 at 19:58.

If someone was looking at GIMP in the app center. Somewhere it should say Comparable to: Adobe Photoshop

If someone was looking at GIMP in the app center. Somewhere it should say Comparable to: Adobe Photoshop

Written by gnarlin the 26 Nov 09 at 21:02.

In the 9.10 version of Ubuntu a feature montage was added to the installation procedure. This would be a great place to explain to new users about how to install new software after the installation is complete.
Perhaps something like (or something that is actually well written and thoughful):

----------------------------------------------------------------------
|SOFTWARE CENTER
|To install more software after installation
|Please go to the "Software Center" and browse
|for a program you wish to install in one of the
|catagories avaliable. Then just click install
|and the software center will do the rest for you
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In the 9.10 version of Ubuntu a feature montage was added to the installation procedure. This would be a great place to explain to new users about how to install new software after the installation is complete. Perhaps something like (or something that is actually well written and thoughful): ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |SOFTWARE CENTER |To install more software after installation |Please go to the "Software Center" and browse |for a program you wish to install in one of the |catagories avaliable. Then just click install |and the software center will do the rest for you ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Written by doobiest the 26 Nov 09 at 21:19.

In addition to solution 1 and 2 I think we should include this for the OS installation.

If installing ubuntu over a native windows install, make a list of installed windows apps. Then after ubuntu finished installing, present the user with a list of software they used to have, and a list of alternatives that they can now have. The user adds checkmarks to those they want.

This could be combined with solution #3. Not only describing to the user how ubuntu uses repositories which are centralized containing stable, secure, and community approved software, but also describes why their favorite programs like itunes are not available. intro to the idea of opensource software.

In addition to solution 1 and 2 I think we should include this for the OS installation. If installing ubuntu over a native windows install, make a list of installed windows apps. Then after ubuntu finished installing, present the user with a list of software they used to have, and a list of alternatives that they can now have. The user adds checkmarks to those they want. This could be combined with solution #3. Not only describing to the user how ubuntu uses repositories which are centralized containing stable, secure, and community approved software, but also describes why their favorite programs like itunes are not available. intro to the idea of opensource software.

Written by gnarlin the 29 Nov 09 at 01:18.

Perhaps just explaining the software center during the montage and adding more specific software categories in the software center. I think that the mint distro does this.
Does anyone know?

Perhaps just explaining the software center during the montage and adding more specific software categories in the software center. I think that the mint distro does this. Does anyone know?

Written by FreeAtMind the 30 Nov 09 at 23:03.

With the guide "For those who migrate from Windows, users could find a table in the software and also links to more detailed information.
A shortcut should be visible on the Desktop LiveCD.

With the guide "For those who migrate from Windows, users could find a table in the software and also links to more detailed information. A shortcut should be visible on the Desktop LiveCD.

Written by DaVince the 3 Dec 09 at 00:10.

By which I mean things like "media player", "mp3 player", "image editor" etcetera and it shows the most popular entries that are related to it first.

By which I mean things like "media player", "mp3 player", "image editor" etcetera and it shows the most popular entries that are related to it first.

Written by g63marty the 3 Dec 09 at 02:37.

Add a "find software" widget to install in a panel or a small app to open a browser to search for linux-based software alternatives. Have the widget or application include the user's linux gui and type (kde,gnome,debian, et al) as parameter of url, so that better matches to software can be found.
Make the online Wiki improvable by the community. Add links to this search forum from ubuntu pages.

Add a "find software" widget to install in a panel or a small app to open a browser to search for linux-based software alternatives. Have the widget or application include the user's linux gui and type (kde,gnome,debian, et al) as parameter of url, so that better matches to software can be found. Make the online Wiki improvable by the community. Add links to this search forum from ubuntu pages.

Written by ikelewis the 3 Dec 09 at 15:52.

Create a video that plays when you first start up Ubuntu, that would describe in detail the process of getting software, connecting to the internet, etc. Also provide links and places where you could get further information, and a little about the history of open-source software. You could even have it as a playlist in Totem, so the content could be broken up into different segments and topics.

Create a video that plays when you first start up Ubuntu, that would describe in detail the process of getting software, connecting to the internet, etc. Also provide links and places where you could get further information, and a little about the history of open-source software. You could even have it as a playlist in Totem, so the content could be broken up into different segments and topics.

Written by neojames the 6 Dec 09 at 20:42.

Instead of playing the video a box comes down which allows you to click it to play the video or just a short one which at the end will tell you to go to the help center where there can be a page with more in depth videos.

Instead of playing the video a box comes down which allows you to click it to play the video or just a short one which at the end will tell you to go to the help center where there can be a page with more in depth videos.

Written by balloooza the 12 Dec 09 at 16:17.

http://alternativeto.net/

It is a great site, it offers web alternative, mac alternatives, windows alternatives, and is maintained, easy to use, active, and also offers alternatives to any application

(not only iPhoto > F-Spot, but also F-Spot > Picasa, Picasa > F-Spot, OOo Writer > Abiword)

I use this site constantly, once or twice a day, conocial could support there efforts by giving them attention, and they could support us with an API of sorts, so instead of sending people to the real website, ubuntu could offer some of this functionality on the software center. or just provide a link to this site.

http://alternativeto.net/ It is a great site, it offers web alternative, mac alternatives, windows alternatives, and is maintained, easy to use, active, and also offers alternatives to any application (not only iPhoto > F-Spot, but also F-Spot > Picasa, Picasa > F-Spot, OOo Writer > Abiword) I use this site constantly, once or twice a day, conocial could support there efforts by giving them attention, and they could support us with an API of sorts, so instead of sending people to the real website, ubuntu could offer some of this functionality on the software center. or just provide a link to this site.

Written by Joots the 16 Dec 09 at 22:31.

See http://allmyapps.com/ubuntu-9.10/
It's easy to find an app for beginners and add a lots of advantage for ubuntu's users.

See http://allmyapps.com/ubuntu-9.10/ It's easy to find an app for beginners and add a lots of advantage for ubuntu's users.

Written by poooody the 15 Dec 09 at 18:35.

As well as, as has been suggested on brainstorm before, having information about Open Source programme alternatives for Windows users, do the same for Mac users.

Have a guide on the Live CD's "Try Ubuntu" feature explaining things such as drivers (propriety and free), and explaining the Ubuntu alternatives to mac programmes which come with the install, e.g. gedit and Text Edit, Terminal and gnome-terminal, Pidgin and iChat, Rhythmbox and iTunes, etc.

As well as, as has been suggested on brainstorm before, having information about Open Source programme alternatives for Windows users, do the same for Mac users. Have a guide on the Live CD's "Try Ubuntu" feature explaining things such as drivers (propriety and free), and explaining the Ubuntu alternatives to mac programmes which come with the install, e.g. gedit and Text Edit, Terminal and gnome-terminal, Pidgin and iChat, Rhythmbox and iTunes, etc.

Written by rafaelmikaelyan the 25 Dec 09 at 10:56.

Give Ubuntu ability to open applications, which are made for Windows. Even Apple did it on his Intel based computers.

Give Ubuntu ability to open applications, which are made for Windows. Even Apple did it on his Intel based computers.

Written by rayken_wong the 15 Apr 10 at 23:45.

When you search up specific software suggest alternatives. This would be especially helpful for when you search for proprietary software that doesn't exist in ubuntu

When you search up specific software suggest alternatives. This would be especially helpful for when you search for proprietary software that doesn't exist in ubuntu

Written by LioBino the 6 Nov 09 at 14:27.

If we develop an environment and a way to install applications that solve the problem of software piracy, many companies will see in Linux as an ally in producing and developing software. The Ubuntu software center tool could be developed and configured for these features.

If we develop an environment and a way to install applications that solve the problem of software piracy, many companies will see in Linux as an ally in producing and developing software. The Ubuntu software center tool could be developed and configured for these features.

Written by warlock24 the 8 Nov 09 at 08:29.

and promote only opensource software, besides there is no 100% protection against cracks, dissasemblers, debuggers, serial number bases and reverse engeenering. Doing that "protection system" is hopeless.

and promote only opensource software, besides there is no 100% protection against cracks, dissasemblers, debuggers, serial number bases and reverse engeenering. Doing that "protection system" is hopeless.

Written by Gaz Davidson the 10 Aug 09 at 09:39.

Have a separate, dedicated games browser to either replace or compliment the games section in Add/Remove Applications.

It could allow browsing and filtering by genre, download size and system requirements. It should provide screenshots and possibly even gameplay video in a way similar to Steam.

Over time it could be extended to include reviews and ratings, community forums, chat rooms, friends lists and instant messaging.

Have a separate, dedicated games browser to either replace or compliment the games section in Add/Remove Applications. It could allow browsing and filtering by genre, download size and system requirements. It should provide screenshots and possibly even gameplay video in a way similar to Steam. Over time it could be extended to include reviews and ratings, community forums, chat rooms, friends lists and instant messaging.

Written by Darwin Survivor the 10 Aug 09 at 18:16.

The Add/Remove application's GUI itself is not very impressive. It is functional for task required, but does not offer screenshots, user comments or even the ability to filter out libraries that no regular user would ever install individually.

If we are going to improve the interface for browsing/installing games, why only do it for games?

The Add/Remove application's GUI itself is not very impressive. It is functional for task required, but does not offer screenshots, user comments or even the ability to filter out libraries that no regular user would ever install individually. If we are going to improve the interface for browsing/installing games, why only do it for games?

Written by Rodrigo the 10 Aug 09 at 22:08.

I think the UBUTU community is already working in something:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AppCenter
it could be nice to have a specific section for games with, as Gaz said, some more data, that is more game related:
- requirements,
- type of game
- number of players

I think the UBUTU community is already working in something: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AppCenter it could be nice to have a specific section for games with, as Gaz said, some more data, that is more game related: - requirements, - type of game - number of players

Written by gianni_casagrande the 30 Aug 09 at 15:18.

A separate media browser could be added, with Games, Movies, Songs and other free media content. There media content could be evaluated by user votes in different aspects. A game for example could be graded in gameplay, graphics, number of players, originality ecc.. and similary for video and audio

A separate media browser could be added, with Games, Movies, Songs and other free media content. There media content could be evaluated by user votes in different aspects. A game for example could be graded in gameplay, graphics, number of players, originality ecc.. and similary for video and audio

Written by ayllu the 7 Sep 09 at 01:33.

News app can have some categories to find games, for example action, sports, wiimote integration, emulators, adventure etc..

News app can have some categories to find games, for example action, sports, wiimote integration, emulators, adventure etc..

Written by Djhg2000 the 8 Sep 09 at 19:47.

Also implement performance ratings compatible with those of Windows Vista/7, i.e. if a computer gets a performance rating of 5.0 in Windows, make sure it gets 5.0 in Ubuntu.

Also implement performance ratings compatible with those of Windows Vista/7, i.e. if a computer gets a performance rating of 5.0 in Windows, make sure it gets 5.0 in Ubuntu.

Written by dbenc the 5 May 09 at 18:18.

A small window that appears maybe once a week (or more if the user wants to) showing some of the best-rated apps in the repositories ... possibly also pointing to reviews, guides, or other similar packages ...

A small window that appears maybe once a week (or more if the user wants to) showing some of the best-rated apps in the repositories ... possibly also pointing to reviews, guides, or other similar packages ...

Written by dbenc the 5 May 09 at 18:20.

Kubuntu uses "Get hot new stuff!" in some applications to draw attention to scripts/plugins and the like ... a new, flashier name will draw attention to the available software.

Kubuntu uses "Get hot new stuff!" in some applications to draw attention to scripts/plugins and the like ... a new, flashier name will draw attention to the available software.

Written by dbenc the 5 May 09 at 18:26.

A screencast on the desktop ( added after installation ) that shows how a user can add new software and that points out some of the apps available ...

A screencast on the desktop ( added after installation ) that shows how a user can add new software and that points out some of the apps available ...

Written by Ssdg the 6 May 09 at 12:05.

The main problem with stuff on the desktop is it's one time stuff and bothering every time you get on a new ubuntu PC/live cd session.

Let's put this on the live CD only and/or during the install process.

The main problem with stuff on the desktop is it's one time stuff and bothering every time you get on a new ubuntu PC/live cd session. Let's put this on the live CD only and/or during the install process.

Written by Lachu the 6 May 09 at 12:20.

Open Ubuntu Channel on Youtube. Integrate some stuff of system on it. Totem might have "Ubuntu Channel" like "YouTube" tab. Firefox should offer Ubuntu Channel link on bookmarks. Synaptic can be integrated too.

Open Ubuntu Channel on Youtube. Integrate some stuff of system on it. Totem might have "Ubuntu Channel" like "YouTube" tab. Firefox should offer Ubuntu Channel link on bookmarks. Synaptic can be integrated too.

Written by jeypeyy the 6 May 09 at 14:42.

During the installation of ubuntu, a slideshow should show the user things that can be hard to understand, such as how to install software. It could show a picture of add/remove... and show a text that sais something like:

"The easiest way to install software in Ubuntu is by using add/remove... Just find the software you want, click on it, press apply and you're ready to go!"

During the installation of ubuntu, a slideshow should show the user things that can be hard to understand, such as how to install software. It could show a picture of add/remove... and show a text that sais something like: "The easiest way to install software in Ubuntu is by using add/remove... Just find the software you want, click on it, press apply and you're ready to go!"

Written by jeypeyy the 6 May 09 at 14:51.

"Installing software" should at least be in the common questions.

"Installing software" should at least be in the common questions.

Written by ilembitov the 11 Dec 08 at 02:52.

Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #16411 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution. Thanks!

<i>Ubuntu Brainstorm was updated in January 2009. Since the idea #16411 was submitted before this update, its rationale and solution are not separated. Please vote accordingly, and if you have the necessary rights, please separate the rationale from the solution.</i><br /> Thanks!

Written by Mondane the 13 Feb 09 at 15:54.

Not all users install software (rights, etc). So it's really only usefull to count the times a user starts an application. This should of course be scaled, like opening an application 20 times in an hour shouldn't make the application more populair.

Maybe it should be a count per day, even if you start the application more times in that day.

Not all users install software (rights, etc). So it's really only usefull to count the times a user starts an application. This should of course be scaled, like opening an application 20 times in an hour shouldn't make the application more populair. Maybe it should be a count per day, even if you start the application more times in that day.

Written by NickRetallack the 21 Sep 09 at 22:08.

We want to measure user behavior, not computer behavior. Popularity points should be awarded only when a user personally selects a package for installation.

Knowing what packages a user personally selected is useful for other things, too, such as removing orphans. You can easily assume that if a user deselects a package that they previously selected for installation, all dependencies that were not also personally selected should be removed as well.

No user-selection points should be awarded for dependencies, since it is not useful to suggest that users install dependencies alone. To keep things simple, I'd say this should apply to even full applications that come as part of a package, like gnome games -- the package is what the user selected, not the individual apps. It might be useful to keep a separate statistic for popular dependencies, however.

Counting the number of times an application is started will be biased unfairly toward programs that start on their own, and against programs that you never quit. It would also bias against multiple document interface programs in favor of programs that open a new instance for each document. To normalize against this issue, you should be sure to award only one per application per day.

However, it might useful to only record a popularity point for an installed app if the user has started it at least two times ever. If you want to get even more sophisticated, allow users to upvote/downvote applications in the package manager. The interface could look like itunes starring, but it should only allow two choices since in any aggregate ratings system the extremes are the only viable options.

We want to measure user behavior, not computer behavior. Popularity points should be awarded only when a user personally selects a package for installation. Knowing what packages a user personally selected is useful for other things, too, such as removing orphans. You can easily assume that if a user deselects a package that they previously selected for installation, all dependencies that were not also personally selected should be removed as well. No user-selection points should be awarded for dependencies, since it is not useful to suggest that users install dependencies alone. To keep things simple, I'd say this should apply to even full applications that come as part of a package, like gnome games -- the package is what the user selected, not the individual apps. It might be useful to keep a separate statistic for popular dependencies, however. Counting the number of times an application is started will be biased unfairly toward programs that start on their own, and against programs that you never quit. It would also bias against multiple document interface programs in favor of programs that open a new instance for each document. To normalize against this issue, you should be sure to award only one per application per day. However, it might useful to only record a popularity point for an installed app if the user has started it at least two times ever. If you want to get even more sophisticated, allow users to upvote/downvote applications in the package manager. The interface could look like itunes starring, but it should only allow two choices since in any aggregate ratings system the extremes are the only viable options.

Written by wish the 3 Mar 09 at 15:48.

If a package is installed via command-line (compiling the source code and not via apt-get or deb install) the system should check if it is available in Add/Remove or not. If available it should put a tick mark on it.
If the package is not in the list (ex: Adobe reader)it should be in another tab as the supported, installed, etc as "Unlisted" so that the next time those packages can be uninstalled without much of an hassle for a newbie.

If a package is installed via command-line (compiling the source code and not via apt-get or deb install) the system should check if it is available in Add/Remove or not. If available it should put a tick mark on it. If the package is not in the list (ex: Adobe reader)it should be in another tab as the supported, installed, etc as "Unlisted" so that the next time those packages can be uninstalled without much of an hassle for a newbie.